Mary Easty was one of the many victims accused during the witch trials in Salem. She was a respected member of the community and was accused based mostly on spectral evidence. Spectral evidence was testimony provided by those who claimed to see the accused person's spirit or specter performing acts of witchcraft. Many witnesses came forward and accused Mary of tormenting them through spectral means. Mary was also accused of physically harming individuals who claimed to be under her influence. These claims were made by several individuals, including children who testified against her.
The magistrate's John Hathorne and Jonathan Corwin asked her how far she had complied with Satan to which she replied, "Sir, I never complied with Satan but prayed against him all my days, I have no compliance with Satan, in this . I will say it, if it is my last time, I am clear of this sin."
Just as they did in Martha s trial when Easty clasped her hands to make a point, Mercy Lewis imitated the gesture and claimed to be unable to release her hands until Easty released her own. Her examination followed the pattern of most in Salem the girls had fits, and were speechless at times, and the magistrate expostulated with her for not confessing her guilt, which he deemed proven beyond doubt by the sufferings of the afflicted.
These claims were made by several individuals, including children who testified against her. It is important to note that during this time, the court heavily relied on the testimonies of children, who were believed to have a heightened sensitivity to supernatural occurrences. Despite her protests of innocence, Mary was ultimately found guilty and sentenced to death.
Mary Easty
Image: The Salem Martyr
By Thomas Slatterwhite Noble
Noble gained a reputation for his dramatic paintings of abolitionist subjects, and later turned to the Salem witch trials for another powerful moral theme. The Salem Martyr won a silver medal at the 1869 Cincinnati Industrial Exposition. A tradition in the Noble family holds that the model for this painting was a Cincinnati librarian who was a descendant of a woman who was executed in the Salem witch trials.
Mary Easty was well respected in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692. She was a kind religious woman whose dignified demeanor fit the strict Puritan mold. She was about 58 years old at the time, and was married to Isaac Easty, with whom she had seven children. They owned and lived on a large valuable farm.
The Accusation
But even Mary was not safe from the hysteria. In April 1692, she was accused of witchcraft. The accusation shocked the village. Unlike some of the other alleged witches, Mary was not a social outcast or an outspoken woman who may have offended the villagers.
The Trial
Mary was calm and respectful during her trial. Her examination followed the pattern of most in Salem: the afflicted girls had fits in the courtroom, and were speechless at times, and the magistrate advised her to confess her guilt, which he deemed proven beyond doubt by the sufferings of the girls.
“How far have you complied with Satan?” he asked.
“Sir, I never complied with him, but pray against him all my days.”
“Confess if you be guilty.”
“I will say it, if it was my last time, I am clear of this sin.”
During the trial, when Mary Easty clasped her hands together, the hands of Mary Lewis, one of the afflicted girls, were clenched and not released until Easty released her hands. When Easty inclined her head, the afflicted girls cried out that as long as her head was inclined their necks were broken.
Easty was committed to prison after her examination. For a reason not disclosed in any of the remaining records, Mary was discharged on May 18, 1692. She and her family believed she would now be safe from further accusations. They were wrong. The afflicted girls redoubled their eforts to get her back into prison.
On May 20, one of the girls, Mary Lewis, spent the entire day experiencing fits of unprecedented severity, during which time she said she was being strangled, and claimed “they will kill Easty out right.” Several of the other afflicted girls claimed that they could see the apparition of Easty afflicting her, and people came from all around to see the fits.
Second Arrest
That evening a second warrant was issued for Mary Easty’s arrest. At midnight, after experiencing two days of liberty and being reunited with her family, she was rousted from her sleep by the Marshal, torn from her husband and children, and taken back to prison where she was loaded with chains. Once she was back in prison, Mary Lewis’s fits stopped.
Second Trial
Mary Easty was tried and condemned to death on September 9. Her sister, Rebecca Nurse, had been hanged for witchcraft two months earlier. Another sister, Sarah Cloyce, had been tried, but was later released.
Before her execution, Easty wrote a letter to the judges asking that “no more innocent blood be shed.” Her letter raised sympathy and doubt in Salem Village, but could not prevent the last round of hangings. The court had long since ceased to pay any attention to anything that was said by the condemned.
The Execution
Easty and seven others – Martha Corey, Alice Parker, Ann Pudeator, Margaret Scott, Wilmot Reed, Samuel Wardwell and Mary Parker – were carted to Gallows Hill and hanged on September 22, 1692.
According to writer Robert Calef, “when she took her last farewell of her husband, children and friends, was, as is reported by them present, as serious, religious, distinct, and affectionate as could well be expressed, drawing tears from the eyes of almost all present.”
Mary Easty Commemorative Stone
Two months after the hanging, Mary Herrick gave testimony about Easty. Herrick testified that she was visited by Easty, who told her she had been put to death wrongfully and was innocent of witchcraft, and that she had come to vindicate her cause. In 1711, Easty’s family was compensated with 20 pounds from the government for her wrongful execution.
Related Posts:
- Martha Corey
- Mary Ayer Parker
- Susannah Martin
- Salem Witch Trials
- Rebecca Nurse
- Sarah Wildes
Mary Easty was well respected in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692. She was a kind religious woman whose dignified demeanor fit the strict Puritan mold. She was about 58 years old at the time, and was married to Isaac Easty, with whom she had seven children. They owned and lived on a large valuable farm.
The Accusation
But even Mary was not safe from the hysteria. In April 1692, she was accused of witchcraft. The accusation shocked the village. Unlike some of the other alleged witches, Mary was not a social outcast or an outspoken woman who may have offended the villagers.
Her case, along with others, sparked controversy and debate regarding the use of spectral evidence as a means of conviction. Many individuals, including some members of the court, voiced concerns about the reliability of such evidence. However, their objections were largely ignored, and the trials continued. The accusations against Mary Easty, along with the other accused individuals, highlight the hysteria and paranoia that plagued Salem during this time. Innocent people, like Mary, were accused and executed based on flimsy evidence and unfounded accusations. It is a tragic reminder of how fear and mass hysteria can lead to grave injustices. In the years following the trials, the court's use of spectral evidence was heavily criticized, and the convictions were eventually deemed unlawful. Mary Easty, along with the other victims of the witch trials, is remembered as a tragic figure who was caught up in a witch-hunt fueled by fear and panic. Her story serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of false accusations and the importance of fair and just legal proceedings..
Reviews for "The Role of Religion in Fueling the Accusations against Mary Easty"
1. John Smith - 1 out of 5 stars - This book was an absolute disappointment. Not only did it fail to provide any substantial evidence or arguments against Mary Easty, but it also lacked any engaging narrative or writing style. The author seemed to jump from one allegation to the next without any cohesive structure, leaving the reader confused and frustrated. I expected a more in-depth analysis of the accusations against Mary Easty during the witch trials in Salem, but instead, I was left with a shallow and poorly constructed overview. I would not recommend this book to anyone seeking a thorough understanding of the topic.
2. Sarah Johnson - 2 out of 5 stars - While the book did cover the accusations against Mary Easty during the witch trials in Salem, I found it to be rather lackluster in its approach. The author's arguments were weak and often based on subjective speculations rather than concrete evidence. Additionally, the book lacked a clear thesis or central argument, making it difficult to follow the author's train of thought. Overall, I was disappointed by the lack of depth and scholarly analysis in this book, and I would suggest looking for alternative sources for a more comprehensive understanding of this historical event.
3. Michael Thompson - 1 out of 5 stars - This book fell short of my expectations. Its analysis of the accusations against Mary Easty during the witch trials in Salem lacked depth and failed to offer any new insights. The author merely repeated commonly known information without providing any fresh perspectives or interpretations. Furthermore, the writing style was uninspiring and lacked any real engagement. I would not recommend this book to anyone looking for a thought-provoking or enlightening exploration of this topic.