In 1692, the Salem Witchcraft Trials took place in colonial Massachusetts. This infamous event began with accusations of witchcraft against several young girls in the town of Salem Village. The girls claimed to be possessed by evil spirits and accused various individuals, mostly women, of practicing witchcraft. The Salem Witchcraft Trials were a dark and unsettling period in American history. The accusations and trials were based on a widespread belief in witchcraft and the supernatural. Fear and paranoia gripped the town as the accusations spread, and the authorities were compelled to take action.
So why all the confision?
When we premiered it in Austin, it was mistakenly announced as The next chapter in The Conjuring universe , Chaves told me, which sent waves of panic all the way through New Line. The very simple reason why La Llorona isn t part of The Conjuring Universe is because it was made without one of the Conjuring franchise producers, so technically it can not be fully embraced, Chaves explained.
Fear and paranoia gripped the town as the accusations spread, and the authorities were compelled to take action. The trials began in February 1692 and continued until May of that same year. During this time, numerous people were arrested, put on trial, and ultimately convicted of witchcraft.
Exclusive: The Simple Reason Why THE CURSE OF LA LLORONA is NOT Part of THE CONJURING Universe
Have you ever noticed how The Curse of La Llorona is treated like the red-headed stepchild of The Conjuring Universe? There’s a very simple reason why. During my exclusive interview with the film’s director, Michael Chaves, in advance of The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It (which he also directed), I asked just that–and I got a surprisingly definitive response.
Also Read: No Past Villains in THE CONJURING 3–And No Happy Ending
Despite what you might have heard, The Curse of La Llorona is not part of The Conjuring Universe like Annabelle and The Nun. That’s right, even though the character Father Perez (played by Tony Amendola) appeared in both 2014’s Annabelle and 2019’s La Llorona, and even though we see a flash of the Annabelle doll in the film, The Curse still isn’t part of the franchise . The reason why is simple.
Synopsis:
In 1970s Los Angeles, the legendary ghost La Llorona is stalking the night — and the children. Ignoring the eerie warning of a troubled mother, a social worker and her own kids are drawn into a frightening supernatural realm. Their only hope of surviving La Llorona’s deadly wrath is a disillusioned priest who practices mysticism to keep evil at bay.
“The very simple reason [why La Llorona] isn’t [part of The Conjuring Universe is because] it was made without one of the [Conjuring franchise] producers, so technically it can not be fully embraced,” Chaves explained. “That’s the very simple reason. Originally, there was only supposed to be a playful nod [to The Conjuring franchise in La Llorona], by putting The Father in and having the Annabelle flash. But it wasn’t supposed to be marketed that way. The plan was, you would get into it, and then it’s like, ‘Oh my God, they’re connected!’ We weren’t, from the beginning, supposed to be doing that. And that’s why it has this outsider status. But as [the character] La Llorona is an outsider herself, I think it fits.
“It’s a tricky situation, I don’t want to give away any trade secrets,” Chaves continued. “The idea was just to have a playful connection [to The Conjuring] because the myth of La Llorona can stand on its own. But James [Wan] was on as a producer, the conversation got started about an Easter Egg. It just kind of got away from itself. People loved that connection. But The Conjuring franchise is created by a team that’s been there since the beginning. It’s not really right to do an onoffical spinoff without the full team.”
So why all the confision?
Related Article: Where THE CONJURING 3 Opening Weekend Lands in Conjuring Universe
“When we premiered it in Austin, it was mistakenly announced as ‘The next chapter in The Conjuring universe’,” Chaves told me, “which sent waves of panic all the way through New Line. We didn’t want anyone to be offended. It was supposed to be just a wink and a nod. Not like we’re trying to steal your mojo or your brand.”
So there you have it, folks. There are only seven, not eight, films in The Conjuring universe. They are: The Conjuring, The Conjuring 2, Annabelle, Annabelle: Creation, The Nun, Annabelle Comes Home, and The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It. The latter is still playing in theaters nationwide and available to stream on HBO Max.
You can check out the trailer and synopsis for The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It below.
Synopsis:
A chilling story of terror, murder and unknown evil that shocked even experienced real-life paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren. One of the most sensational cases from their files, it starts with a fight for the soul of a young boy, then takes them beyond anything they’d ever seen before, to mark the first time in U.S. history that a murder suspect would claim demonic possession as a defense.
Chaves directs The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It from a screenplay penned by David Leslie Johnson-McGoldrick; the film stars Vera Farmiga, Patrick Wilson, and Julian Hilliard.
Are you a fan of The Cuse of La Llorona (even though it’s not really part of The Conjuring Universe)? Have you seen The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It? Let us know in the comments below or on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram! You can also carry on the convo with me personally on Twitter @josh_millican. Dread Central on Google News!
“When we premiered it in Austin, it was mistakenly announced as ‘The next chapter in The Conjuring universe’,” Chaves told me, “which sent waves of panic all the way through New Line. We didn’t want anyone to be offended. It was supposed to be just a wink and a nod. Not like we’re trying to steal your mojo or your brand.”
Many were sentenced to death by hanging, while others were imprisoned. The trials were conducted in a highly flawed and prejudiced manner. The accused were generally presumed guilty from the start, and spectral evidence, or supposed visions and dreams of the accusers, was considered admissible in court. This led to false accusations and unfair convictions. The Salem Witchcraft Trials finally came to an end when the governor of Massachusetts, Sir William Phips, prohibited the use of spectral evidence in court. This decision led to a decline in the number of accusations and a shift in public opinion, ultimately bringing an end to the trials. The aftermath of the trials was one of remorse and regret. Many people involved in the accusations and trials later admitted their wrongdoing and expressed remorse for the lives that were lost. In 1697, the court declared the convictions of those accused during the trials as null and void, and the families of the victims were compensated for their losses. The Salem Witchcraft Trials serve as a dark reminder of the dangers of mass hysteria and the importance of due process. The events of 1692 continue to be studied and explored for their psychological, sociological, and historical implications..
Reviews for "Salem Witchcraft Trials: Understanding the Mass Hysteria of 1692"
1. John Doe - 1 star
I was really disappointed with the 1692 Salem Witchcraft Walk. The tour guide seemed uninterested and lacked in-depth knowledge about the history. It felt like he was simply reciting facts rather than engaging with the group. Additionally, the walk itself was disorganized and it was difficult to hear the guide over the noise of the busy streets. Overall, I wouldn't recommend this tour to anyone looking for an authentic and informative Salem witchcraft experience.
2. Jane Smith - 2 stars
I had high expectations for the 1692 Salem Witchcraft Walk, but unfortunately, it fell short. The tour guide was friendly, but the information provided was superficial and didn't delve into the rich history of the Salem witch trials. Additionally, the group size was too large, making it hard to stay engaged and hear what the guide was saying. I was hoping for a more intimate and immersive experience, but this tour didn't deliver.
3. Samantha Johnson - 2 stars
While the 1692 Salem Witchcraft Walk had potential, it ultimately left me underwhelmed. The guide seemed unprepared and struggled to answer basic questions. The pacing of the tour was also off, with long periods of walking in between points of interest. The lack of engaging storytelling and historical context made it difficult to fully appreciate the significance of the sites we visited. Unfortunately, I cannot recommend this tour to others who are genuinely interested in learning about the Salem witch trials.