How the Flyers mascot became a viral meme sensation

The Flyers mascot meme refers to a viral internet phenomenon involving the Philadelphia Flyers' mascot, Gritty. Gritty is a large, furry, orange creature with googly eyes who has become known for his energetic and playful personality. The meme began in September 2018 when the Flyers introduced Gritty as their new mascot. Almost immediately, fans and internet users found Gritty's appearance to be quite humorous and quickly started creating memes and captions to go along with pictures of the mascot. Gritty's unique and sometimes bizarre facial expressions and antics quickly made him a popular subject for memes on various social media platforms such as Twitter, Instagram, and Reddit. Many fans and internet users took to creating their own versions of Gritty memes, often pairing his image with captions that were humorous, sarcastic, or satirical.

But doing the former properly would be interesting. I ended up starting to write the reverse, a Strategic and Socio-Economic Analysis of UAW#97.

One has to pretty much ignore a lot of times when magic is either nonlethal when it shouldn t be, or characters mentioning specifically KOing via magic damage as a thing, in order to make it lethal by nature. Defensive enchantments are very effective against direct kill weapons, so modern attack modes tend to be laser-focused on disrupting psyker energy and concentration.

Many fans and internet users took to creating their own versions of Gritty memes, often pairing his image with captions that were humorous, sarcastic, or satirical. The popularity of the Flyers mascot meme continued to grow as more and more fans and internet users shared their own creations, and it soon became a widespread internet trend. The meme has been used to comically and creatively express various ideas and opinions, often in a relatable and humorous way.

💀 Necro Magical Girl Lyrical Nanoha General Discussion Thread (1 Viewer)

A bunch of fans do seem to have gotten the idea that Midchildan magic can't kill, rather than Midchilda preferring magic because it *has* a non-lethal setting, and using it even at a handicap. Cropped up in the 2009 WIW threads, too.

I really doubt US Intelligence would have gotten a tour of Arc-en-ciel firing consoles; at that point the whole thing smacked less of "actual analysis" and more "fan ranting about what we see".

But doing the former properly would be interesting. I ended up starting to write the reverse, a Strategic and Socio-Economic Analysis of UAW#97.

Icarium

Validated User

Can't kill is weird. I doubt it's explicitly that. On the other hand, I've seen fans who argue the opposite, even in these threads. To which I point to Nanoha-mama blowing the BEJESUS out of whassherface. It blew the hell out of a ship, ripping through steel walls, but managed to be non-lethal to her. Definitely more than just 'low power' or other excuses.

Gojira

in a rubber monster suit

And then there's writer fiat. Maybe that blast should have killed her under "normal" circumstances, but she just happened to live, cause reasons. Or Nanoha knew that her defense would be enough to withstand the blast after it had been weakened by passing through several bulkheads, cause Nanoha.(*)

It's hard to say for certain.

EDIT: (*) What I mean here is 'cause Nanoha is "just that good." Don't try shooting your blasts at people, kids, someone will get hurt. (I was going to say "you'll put your eye out" but then I realized that had actually happened.)

Icarium

Validated User

Well, also, Nanoha specifically says she'll KO with magic damage a few times, meaning magic damage is special that way. Magic having a nonlethal setting is pretty explicitly baked into the setting. One has to pretty much ignore a /lot/ of times when magic is either nonlethal when it shouldn't be, or characters mentioning specifically KOing via magic damage as a thing, in order to make it lethal by nature.

Gojira

in a rubber monster suit

Well, it seems it must be lethal under some circumstances, even if it's normally safer. How else does one explain Vice Granscenic's reaction to his sister being shot?

Ikselam

exits, pursued by a bear

I think it's clear that magic can kill or injure people (and anthropomorphized dogs), but that the main characters refrain from using it that way because nonlethal is just as effective and they're not barbarians.

Icarium

Validated User

It hit her right in the eye. If magic were LETHAL, she'd be DEAD. A bullet - or equivalent - to the eye socket ain't pretty. Instead it just blinded her. I'm fine with even non-lethal magic being damaging in that way if it hits the wrong place.

Ikselam

exits, pursued by a bear

Something something magic resistance. I feel like any rationalization I can come up with for why Arf can tank a point blank shot will be less absurd than positing that using magic to kill someone is more difficult than using it to disintegrate whole city blocks.

What it really comes down to is that nobody dies in Nanoha because it's a feel-good franchise, and its setting is developed haphazardly enough that it's difficult to come up with a convincing in-character explanation for that.

s/LaSH

Member

Nanoha metaphysics are not as crunchy as other settings, leaving us to conclude that magic tends to leave combatants alive at the same time it knocks buildings in, and that's just the way it is.

But I think we have some clues.

Don't forget that most combatants are packing serious defensive mojo. The Barrier Jacket arrangement is there for a reason. Those things are partially a cosmetic wrapping over some kind of more serious protective enchantment layer; Nanoha configures her personal costume herself, but the basics of the Barrier Jacket are pre-programmed. Critically, the Jacket isn't a physically-constituted protective layer, which might be why it represents as cloth. We see evidence for this when Vita hits Nanoha in the chest with a straight-up warhammer, and the outer layer of Jacket just disintegrates and knocks bodily Nanoha into a wall. Graf Eisen is a magical weapon, but I really don't think that was a magic attack - it was a hunk of steel traveling at jet velocity.

Speculation: standard defences are enough to turn an artillery strike-level attack spell into a non-lethal impact. Possibly they distribute force evenly across the body - and I don't mean like a well-fitted flight suit, I mean a volumetric force field so every part of the body is accelerated at the same time. In theory, the impact becomes unnoticeable, save for the fact that now you're flying backwards (and had better use your verniers, uh, flight spells). A particularly heavy impact will blow a fuse in the defences and cause a layer to self-destruct. There's also some unavoidable physical trauma as the forcefield warps and strains, which might show up as deep tissue bruising later on and hurts like hell; and of course some energy overflow from magic attacks might sting like the dickens. A sustained beating will put a fighter down and keep them down, but there probably won't be any broken bones or internal bleeding - just some surface lacerations.

So when a combat cyborg takes a Starlight Breaker to the face, I assume the cyborg has just enough augmented toughness to survive without disintegrating. Plus I think Starlight Breaker isn't a blast, but a stream - you keep the firehose on the subject until the subject ceases resistance or you run out of recycled mana emissions. There was enough time to tune the effect while it was cutting through divine starship bulkheads.

In my grim future of the Warhammer 40K timeline (60K for short), they run on remarkably similar rules. However, the justification for non-lethal spell damage is very different. In 60K, most members of the galactic community are psykers. Defensive enchantments are very effective against direct kill weapons, so modern attack modes tend to be laser-focused on disrupting psyker energy and concentration. This happens to have the side-effect of jangling the nervous system and dropping the target in a non-lethal, lightly stunned heap. You don't bring a bolter to a wand fight, because the bolter won't get through modern combat robes, and the wand will be able to blow holes in powered armour and disable the user by adapting with the speed of thought (because it's brain powered).

Turns out the downfall of pure humanity and the slide into mutation looks a lot like a magical girl fight.

But I think we have some clues.

In addition to being a popular subject for memes, Gritty himself has embraced the meme culture and has actively participated in the creation and distribution of meme-worthy content. The Flyers organization has frequently posted photos and videos of Gritty on their social media platforms, often captioned with humorous and meme-worthy phrases. The Flyers mascot meme has not only brought a sense of fun and humor to the world of hockey and sports but has also contributed to the wider internet culture. It is an example of how a simple image or idea can quickly spread and become a viral sensation. The meme serves as a testament to the creative and humorous nature of internet users and their ability to transform a seemingly ordinary mascot into a beloved and memeworthy character..

Reviews for "How the Flyers mascot meme took over social media"

1. Sarah - 1 star - As a long-time Flyers fan, I was incredibly disappointed when the Flyers introduced their new mascot, which quickly became a meme. I can't understand why they decided to create such a bizarre and unappealing character to represent our team. It feels like a cheap attempt to gain attention on social media, rather than a thoughtful and meaningful mascot choice. The memes that have circulated only further highlight the mockery and embarrassment this mascot brings to our beloved team. I hope the Flyers management takes this as a lesson and reconsiders their mascot choice.

2. John - 2 stars - The Flyers mascot meme is just another example of how the sports world is becoming more interested in viral fame rather than the game itself. While I understand the importance of engaging with fans on social media, creating a ridiculous mascot like this takes away from the seriousness of the sport. It may generate some attention online, but it's not doing justice to the rich history and tradition of the Flyers. I would much rather see the team focus on their performance on the ice, rather than wasting time and resources on a mascot that is nothing more than a meme.

3. Emily - 2.5 stars - While I appreciate the Flyers' attempt to connect with younger fans through social media, the mascot meme just misses the mark for me. The Flyers are a respected team with a strong fan base, and I feel like this mascot undermines that reputation. It seems like a desperate ploy to go viral and gain attention, rather than a genuine effort to engage with fans. I hope the team reevaluates their approach and chooses a mascot that represents the Flyers' values and history more appropriately.

The hidden meaning behind the Flyers mascot meme