A cackle of witches is not a term that is commonly used, as there is no specific collective noun to describe a group of witches. However, the term "coven" is often used to refer to a group of witches who practice together. The word "coven" originates from the Old English word "cumb," meaning a gathering or assembly. It is believed that the term was commonly used during the medieval times to describe a group of witches who performed rituals and spells together. In modern times, the term "coven" has been popularized by literary works, such as the famous play "Macbeth" by William Shakespeare, which features a group of witches known as the "weird sisters." The coven is often depicted as a secretive and close-knit group who possess supernatural powers and engage in magical activities.
Не показаны другие разделы: 16
He produces a wonderfully skillful synthesis of the available material one that sees the occult in the light of reason and reason in the light of the mystical and paranormal. Название The Occult A History Автор Colin Wilson Издатель Random House, 1971 ISBN 0394465555, 9780394465555 Количество страниц Всего страниц 601 nbsp nbsp Экспорт цитаты BiBTeX EndNote RefMan.
" The coven is often depicted as a secretive and close-knit group who possess supernatural powers and engage in magical activities. While the term "cackle" is not specifically associated with a group of witches, it is often used to describe the loud and shrill laughter that is commonly associated with witches in popular culture. This stereotypical cackling laughter is often depicted as a sign of wickedness and malevolence.
History of the Occult in America
I am interested in the history of the occult, religion, demons, mythology, the supernatural, and the ideology of it all. I suppose I am wondering what would be the best history field for me to study if I wanted to become a historian of such subjects? I love to learn, it is everything to me, and to have a job that entitles me to learn as a living would be ideal.
Answer
I think that if your intention is to study occultism and mythology, you should major in economics, focusing especially on monetary policy. (Just kidding!)
In truth, many colleges and universities have established departments of religious studies, as opposed to theology or divinity studies. Generally speaking, in the somewhat vaguely defined academic field of religious studies, historians, philosophers, psychologists, anthropologists, and sociologists take religion, religious beliefs, practices, and believers as their objects of study. This is a different sort of academic undertaking than, say, studying religion in preparation for a ministry.
It is also common for colleges and universities to have individual courses on religion in other departments, such as philosophy, literature, classics, history, anthropology, or folklore.
Most academic study of American religious history has focused on the main streams of belief and practice. Because you bring up the issue of getting a job, I will say that this means that academics who might be capable of demonstrating expertise only in what might be regarded as the byways of religion—the occult and all that implies—have found themselves with fewer opportunities to land teaching positions. Developing a broad academic expertise, therefore, in the history of American religion would be a strategy that would maximize a young Ph.D.’s chances of landing a teaching position, no matter what he or she had specialized in.
However, as you might guess, now that the children of the 1960s and 1970s have become the academic old guard, as it were, scholars of American religious history have turned more attention not only to the history in America of the belief and practice of systems that have been explicitly “on the margins,” that is, occultist, but also to the way in which even mainstream religious groups have been influenced by the “alternative spiritualities” that have germinated and taken root here. This would include the Shakers, the Mormons, and the Masons, for example, as well as communal utopians, Swedenborgians, Spiritualists, Theosophists, Christian Scientists, proponents of the “New Thought” movement, and such 20th-century groups as Scientologists and those loosely linked under the name of the “New Age” movement. An example of a recent academic look at American religious history in this vein is Catherine L. Albanese’s 2007 book, A Republic of Mind and Spirit: A Cultural History of American Metaphysical Religion.
For more information
Mitch Horowitz, Occult America: The Secret History of How Mysticism Shaped Our Nation. New York: Bantam Books, 2009.
Alice Felt Tyler, Freedom’s Ferment: Phases of American Social History to 1860. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1944.
Bibliography
Catherine L. Albanese, A Republic of Mind and Spirit: A Cultural History of American Metaphysical Religion. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.
However, as you might guess, now that the children of the 1960s and 1970s have become the academic old guard, as it were, scholars of American religious history have turned more attention not only to the history in America of the belief and practice of systems that have been explicitly “on the margins,” that is, occultist, but also to the way in which even mainstream religious groups have been influenced by the “alternative spiritualities” that have germinated and taken root here. This would include the Shakers, the Mormons, and the Masons, for example, as well as communal utopians, Swedenborgians, Spiritualists, Theosophists, Christian Scientists, proponents of the “New Thought” movement, and such 20th-century groups as Scientologists and those loosely linked under the name of the “New Age” movement. An example of a recent academic look at American religious history in this vein is Catherine L. Albanese’s 2007 book, A Republic of Mind and Spirit: A Cultural History of American Metaphysical Religion.
So, while there is no specific term for a group of witches, the term "cackle" can help to evoke the imagery and atmosphere often associated with witches and their gatherings..
Reviews for "The Sound of Magic: Analyzing the Acoustics of a Witch's Cackle"
1. John - 2 stars - I was really excited to read "What is a cackle of witches called", but I ended up being quite disappointed. The book started off promising, with an intriguing concept and an interesting group of characters. However, as I delved deeper into the story, I found the pacing to be incredibly slow and the plot to lack depth. The author focused too much on the mundane aspects of the characters' lives, and it felt like the magical elements were just thrown in as an afterthought. Overall, I felt that the book had great potential but failed to deliver an engaging and cohesive story.
2. Emma - 1 star - I found "What is a cackle of witches called" to be a major letdown. The writing style was incredibly dull and lacked any sort of charm or wit. The characters were one-dimensional and unrelatable, with no development throughout the entire book. The plot was predictable and lacked any sort of excitement or suspense. I was hoping for a fun and whimsical read about witches, but instead, I got a monotonous and forgettable story. I would not recommend this book to anyone looking for an enjoyable and entertaining read.
3. Sarah - 2 stars - I had high hopes for "What is a cackle of witches called", but I was left unimpressed. The book lacked originality and felt like a rehashed version of every other witch-themed novel I've read. The characters were cookie-cutter stereotypes, and their actions and motivations were poorly explained. The writing was also subpar, with repetitive phrases and cliché descriptions. While there were a few moments of potential, overall, the book failed to deliver a captivating story that stands out from the crowd.