The Magic Clip cordless charger is a device that allows users to charge their electronic devices without the hassle of tangled cords. It uses advanced wireless charging technology to power a wide range of devices, including smartphones, tablets, and smartwatches. This innovative charger works by creating an electromagnetic field, which transfers energy to the device being charged. This means that users can simply place their device on the charging pad, and it will automatically start charging without the need for any cords or cables. One of the main advantages of the Magic Clip cordless charger is its convenience. Users no longer have to worry about carrying around multiple charging cords or finding an available power outlet.
After consulting with Aztec scholars, university officials declared the Aztec Warrior as the official mascot in 2003. One year later, the latest iteration of the mascot emerged in 2004.
After dropping Monty Montezuma as the mascot name, San Diego State briefly experimented with Ambassador Montezuma in 2002, The San Diego Union-Tribune reported. San Diego State University s Senate Committee on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion proposed on Tuesday that the university form a task force to develop recommendations for a new mascot to replace the Aztec Warrior.
Users no longer have to worry about carrying around multiple charging cords or finding an available power outlet. Instead, they can easily charge their devices wherever they are, whether it's at home, in the office, or even on the go. Another benefit of this wireless charger is its efficiency.
SDSU to keep Aztec name following racially and politically charged debate
SDSU will keep the Aztec Warrior name but downplay its use for the school mascot.
By Gary Robbins May 17, 2018 4:10 PM PT Share Close extra sharing optionsSan Diego State University will keep the word Aztec as its nickname but create a more culturally sensitive version of its mascot in a decision that reflects nearly 20 years of racially charged debate about how the school treats indigenous people.
“The Aztec Warrior … will be retained, but as Spirit Leader, not mascot,” interim SDSU President Sally Roush told the Union-Tribune on Thursday.
“We just expect a much more dignified and appropriate demeanor from that person. You won’t see the Aztec Warrior doing pushups in the endzone. You won’t see the Aztec Warrior dancing with the cheerleaders.”
AdvertisementHer action is part of a larger movement in the United States in which everyone from small high schools to large universities to Major League Baseball teams have tweaked or dropped nicknames and mascots that were regarded as culturally unacceptable.
Roush heavily based her decision on a report produced by a 17-member task force of faculty, students, alumni and community leaders who explored whether the school’s use of Aztec is culturally insensitive, if not racist. Many critics have made those claims, including an SDSU lecturer who pointed out that the Aztecs never lived in the southwestern United States. They were from central Mexico.
Two task force members recused themselves while creating a report that says in one spot, “No human should be a mascot.”
The task force report led Roush to decide that the words Monty and Zuma will no longer be used in the name of certain awards that are granted by the university. Those nicknames represent the breaking apart of the word Montezuma, which Roush said is “very disrespectful of the emperor of the Aztec civilization.”
Adela de la Torre, a social justice expert who will become SDSU’s permanent president in late June, has read the report and agrees with Roush’s decisions, the university said.
The issue is settled — for now. Roush said the university could revisit the issue in the future if there are reasons to.
“This is a very difficult issue with strong feelings on all sides,” said Adam Day, an SDSU graduate who this week was named chairman of the board of trustees for the California State University system.
“President Roush was very deliberative and inclusive in her outreach. The report’s recommendations are very thoughtful. I respect the process and her decisions.”
The task force conducted a major survey that found that the university, its alumni and the public want to keep the name Aztecs, which has been in use since 1925. But the report also contains dissent and anxiety.
While discussing the name, the task force pointed out that, “In the current political climate relative to the US/Mexico border, the elimination of the moniker may be read as discriminatory and an attempt to ‘erase’ our relationship to Mexico and other Latin Americans.”
But the task force also considered the opposite point of view, saying that getting rid of the nickname is reasonable because, “Change is warranted because of the current political climate that leans toward racial and ethnic discrimination.”
The new report says that more than 200,000 survey forms were sent to alumni, faculty and staff, students and the community, asking whether Aztec should be used as a nickname and as the name of the school mascot. Nearly 13,000 people replied. Among them, nearly nine in 10 supported keeping the nickname and nearly 8 in 10 endorsed a human Aztec Warrior mascot.
Here is a sample of some of the respondents:
-- “The name Aztec does not mock the anciet people, unlike the name Redskins whch is considered a slur.
-- “I will not give the school any money if they change it.”
--”Honestly, I’m Mexican and I think it’s pretty dope that my mascot is an Aztec like me. Just don’t disrespect the Aztec culture by having like a white person be the Aztec mascot or something.”
-- “Get over this politically correct BS in California, there are more important issues . ”
-- “(The name) perpetuates a tired, played out, dehumanizing stereotype of indigeous people.”
Changing nicknames and mascots isn’t new. Stanford switched its nickname from Indians to Cardinal in 1972.
The subject didn’t surface as a major issue at SDSU until 2000 when the Native American Student Alliance raised objections about the university’s spear-carrying mascot, Monty Montezuma. That set off a long public debate and led to a student referendum in which most students voted in favor on keeping both the Aztec nickname and Monty Montezuma.
The campus approved a more historically accurate version of the Aztec warrior in 2004. But the issue didn’t entirely fade. There was a big flareup in 2016 when Oscar Monge, an SDSU lecturer, published a paper that said the use of the Aztec as a mascot is racist and historically inaccurate.
In late 2017, SDSU’s campus Senate passed an overwhelming, but non-binding, vote to retire the Aztec mascot. That vote, and the concerns of students, led to the new task force, and Roush’s decisions on the Aztec name.
Roush told the Union-Tribune on Thursday that her decision to keep the Aztec name was in no way influenced by fundraising.
“The fact that they feel a sense of affiliaton with the university because of the Aztec name, from which they draw a lot of personal pride — that factor weighed in,” said Roush.
But the need for money isn’t a minor issue.
The university will soon start gearing up for a major capital campaign that could seek to raise upwards of $1 billion to do everything from cover scholarships to hire and keep top faculty to underwrite research and, possibly, construct new buildings.
Specifically, the university and its boosters are seeking the right to turn the SDCCU stadium property in Mission Valley into a satellite campus that would feature a 35,000-seat stadium, 1.6 million square feet of academic and research space, housing, and commercial developments.
The so-called SDSU West initiative will go before voters in November. The university says it needs the land because it has run out of room to expand on its main campus. The proposal is competing with a similar initiative known as SoccerCity.
By deciding the Aztec name issue, Roush took an issue off the plate of incoming president del al Torre. She said it wasn’t easy.
“I knew that on either end of the spectrum there would be, and I’m sure will be, people who are deeply distressed,” Roush said. “I carry that heavily. For me the hardest thing is contemplating that some people might take this as an indication that I don’t really care about them deeply. But I do.”
Gary Warth and Merrie Monteagudo contributed to this story.
It provides fast charging speeds, ensuring that devices are charged quickly and efficiently. This is particularly important for users who rely heavily on their devices and need them to be charged and ready to use as soon as possible. The Magic Clip cordless charger is also designed with safety in mind. It comes with built-in safety features such as overvoltage protection and temperature control to prevent any damage to the devices being charged. Additionally, it has a sleek and compact design, making it easy to carry and store when not in use. Overall, the Magic Clip cordless charger is an excellent solution for those looking for a convenient and efficient way to charge their electronic devices. With its advanced wireless charging technology and user-friendly design, it is a must-have accessory for anyone on the go..
Reviews for "Understanding the technology behind the Magic clip cordless charger"
1. John - 1 out of 5 stars - I bought the Magic clip cordless charger and I have to say I'm incredibly disappointed with its performance. First of all, it takes forever to fully charge my phone. I have to leave it on the charger for hours just to get a decent amount of battery life. Furthermore, the charging pad itself is very temperamental. Sometimes it charges my phone, and other times it doesn't even recognize that it's connected. Overall, I would not recommend the Magic clip cordless charger to anyone in need of a reliable and efficient charging solution.
2. Sarah - 2 out of 5 stars - I had high hopes for the Magic clip cordless charger, but it ended up falling short of my expectations. The charging speed is incredibly slow and it often disconnects randomly, leaving my phone with an incomplete charge. Additionally, I find that the charging pad gets quite hot after prolonged use, which concerns me in terms of safety. I would suggest investing in a different wireless charger that offers better performance and reliability.
3. Mark - 2 out of 5 stars - The Magic clip cordless charger was a letdown for me. I found the design to be quite bulky and not very aesthetically pleasing. The charging pad itself is also quite slippery, making it difficult to keep my phone in place while it charges. On top of that, the charging speed is quite slow compared to other wireless chargers on the market. Overall, I was not impressed with the Magic clip cordless charger and would not recommend it to others.
4. Laura - 1 out of 5 stars - The Magic clip cordless charger is a waste of money in my opinion. It never charges my phone properly and I always end up having to plug it in with a cable to get a decent charge. The overall performance is lackluster and it often fails to recognize my phone when I place it on the charging pad. I regret purchasing this charger and wish I had chosen a different brand instead. Save yourself the frustration and avoid the Magic clip cordless charger altogether.