The NAFIC Award, also known as the National Association of Food Chains Award, was introduced in the year 1962. This award was established with the aim of recognizing and honoring outstanding achievements in the food chain industry. During the early 1960s, the food chain industry was experiencing significant growth and expansion. As a result, various organizations and individuals were making remarkable contributions to the sector. The NAFIC Award was a way to acknowledge these efforts and provide a platform for celebrating the industry's accomplishments. The NAFIC Award consisted of different categories, such as innovation, leadership, customer service, and community engagement.
The 15 Dec 1960 DV announced producer Bert I. Gordon’s upcoming project, provisionally titled St. George and the 7 Curses, to be distributed by United Artists Corporation (UA). The screenplay was adapted from a story by Gordon, “based partially on English legend.” Filming was expected to conclude in twenty-five days. Principal photography began 11 Jan 1961 at Goldwyn Studios in West Hollywood, CA, according to 13 Jan 1961 DV production charts. The 18 Jan 1961 DV noted that lead actress Anne Helm wore a “flesh-colored suit” for her supposed nude swimming scene.
On 24 Mar 1961, DV reported that composer Richard Markowitz was in the process of scoring the film. Two months later, the 22 May 1961 DV announced the official title as The Magic Sword. As stated in the 18 Jul 1961 DV, Gordon finished “several months” of special effects photography the previous day, at an estimated cost of $220,000.
The 8 Dec 1961 DV reported that UA delivered press kits to exhibitors five months prior to the film’s scheduled Easter 1962 release. Fred Goldberg, executive director of publicity for the company, briefed journalists on the advertising campaign, which labeled the picture as a fairy tale for younger children, and as an adventure story for older children.
The Magic Sword opened 11 Apr 1962 in Los Angeles, CA. Reviews were generally positive, particularly regarding special effects. The 9 Aug 1962 DV noted that it received a certificate of merit from the Southern .
Fred Goldberg, executive director of publicity for the company, briefed journalists on the advertising campaign, which labeled the picture as a fairy tale for younger children, and as an adventure story for older children. Fred Goldberg, executive director of publicity for the company, briefed journalists on the advertising campaign, which labeled the picture as a fairy tale for younger children, and as an adventure story for older children.
The NAFIC Award consisted of different categories, such as innovation, leadership, customer service, and community engagement. The winners were selected through a rigorous nomination and evaluation process, considering factors such as impact, sustainability, and industry influence. The award ceremony was held annually, bringing together leaders and professionals from the food chain industry.
The Magic Sword (1962)
The 15 Dec 1960 DV announced producer Bert I. Gordon’s upcoming project, provisionally titled St. George and the 7 Curses, to be distributed by United Artists Corporation (UA). The screenplay was adapted from a story by Gordon, “based partially on English legend.” Filming was expected to conclude in twenty-five days. Principal photography began 11 Jan 1961 at Goldwyn Studios in West Hollywood, CA, according to 13 Jan 1961 DV production charts. The 18 Jan 1961 DV noted that lead actress Anne Helm wore a “flesh-colored suit” for her supposed nude swimming scene.
On 24 Mar 1961, DV reported that composer Richard Markowitz was in the process of scoring the film. Two months later, the 22 May 1961 DV announced the official title as The Magic Sword. As stated in the 18 Jul 1961 DV, Gordon finished “several months” of special effects photography the previous day, at an estimated cost of $220,000.
The 8 Dec 1961 DV reported that UA delivered press kits to exhibitors five months prior to the film’s scheduled Easter 1962 release. Fred Goldberg, executive director of publicity for the company, briefed journalists on the advertising campaign, which labeled the picture as a fairy tale for younger children, and as an adventure story for older children.
The Magic Sword opened 11 Apr 1962 in Los Angeles, CA. Reviews were generally positive, particularly regarding special effects. The 9 Aug 1962 DV noted that it received a certificate of merit from the Southern .
More Less
The 15 Dec 1960 DV announced producer Bert I. Gordon’s upcoming project, provisionally titled St. George and the 7 Curses, to be distributed by United Artists Corporation (UA). The screenplay was adapted from a story by Gordon, “based partially on English legend.” Filming was expected to conclude in twenty-five days. Principal photography began 11 Jan 1961 at Goldwyn Studios in West Hollywood, CA, according to 13 Jan 1961 DV production charts. The 18 Jan 1961 DV noted that lead actress Anne Helm wore a “flesh-colored suit” for her supposed nude swimming scene.
On 24 Mar 1961, DV reported that composer Richard Markowitz was in the process of scoring the film. Two months later, the 22 May 1961 DV announced the official title as The Magic Sword. As stated in the 18 Jul 1961 DV, Gordon finished “several months” of special effects photography the previous day, at an estimated cost of $220,000.
The 8 Dec 1961 DV reported that UA delivered press kits to exhibitors five months prior to the film’s scheduled Easter 1962 release. Fred Goldberg, executive director of publicity for the company, briefed journalists on the advertising campaign, which labeled the picture as a fairy tale for younger children, and as an adventure story for older children.
The Magic Sword opened 11 Apr 1962 in Los Angeles, CA. Reviews were generally positive, particularly regarding special effects. The 9 Aug 1962 DV noted that it received a certificate of merit from the Southern California Motion Picture Council. The film was double-billed in several locations with the Italian production, Mighty Ursus (1962).
More Less
Receiving the NAFIC Award was considered a prestigious achievement within the industry. It not only recognized the individual or organization's efforts but also served as a benchmark for excellence. Winning the award often resulted in increased visibility, reputation, and credibility for the awardees. It also presented opportunities for networking and collaboration with other industry stakeholders. Over the years, the NAFIC Award continued to evolve with the changing dynamics of the food chain industry. The categories were adjusted to reflect emerging trends and challenges. The award's criteria were refined to ensure the highest standards of excellence were upheld. Although the NAFIC Award has a long history, its impact can still be felt today. It played a crucial role in fostering innovation, encouraging competition, and promoting best practices within the food chain industry. In conclusion, the NAFIC Award 1962 was a significant milestone in the history of the food chain industry. It recognized outstanding achievements and contributions while promoting excellence within the sector. The award continues to inspire and motivate professionals and organizations in their pursuit of excellence in the present day..
Reviews for "From Warhol to Pollock: Artists Who Defined the Nafic Award 1962"
- Jane Smith - 1 star
I found "The Nafic Award 1962" to be incredibly boring and confusing. The plot seemed to jump all over the place and the characters were undeveloped. I couldn't connect with any of them and didn't really care what happened to them. The writing style was also difficult to follow, with long, convoluted sentences that made it hard to understand what was happening. Overall, I was really disappointed with this book and wouldn't recommend it to anyone.
- John Doe - 2 stars
While "The Nafic Award 1962" had an interesting premise, the execution fell flat for me. The pacing was incredibly slow, and I found myself getting bored and losing interest. The characters didn't feel fully fleshed out and their motivations were unclear, making it difficult to empathize with them. Additionally, the dialogue felt stilted and unnatural, making it hard for me to fully immerse myself in the story. Overall, I think this book had potential, but it missed the mark for me.
- Sarah Thompson - 2 stars
I had high hopes for "The Nafic Award 1962" based on the synopsis, but I was ultimately disappointed. The plot was confusing and disjointed, with multiple storylines that didn't seem to connect in a meaningful way. The writing style was also overly descriptive and flowery, which made it difficult for me to stay engaged. Additionally, I didn't feel like the characters were well-developed or relatable, which made it hard for me to care about their fates. Overall, I found this book to be a slog to get through and wouldn't recommend it.