The Witch House is a short story written by H.P. Lovecraft, one of the most influential horror writers of the 20th century. Lovecraft's distinctive style and themes have made him a cult figure in the genre, and The Witch House is a prime example of his work. The story revolves around a young man named Walter Gilman, who becomes fascinated by the history and architecture of a mysterious house in Arkham, Massachusetts. The house, known as the Witch House, was once the home of a notorious witch named Keziah Mason.
“(The script) deviated a lot from the Lovecraft story,” Hardwicke says. “Mika came up with all these ideas to enrich it and introduce more human dynamics. We added more layers to it and enriched the female characters.”
Inspired by an academic lecture Lovecraft had attended about the size of the universe, The Dreams in the Witch House uses the supernatural forces of witchcraft and religion to tell a scientific story of dreams and dimensions and differential geometry. S ome circumstance had more or less suddenly given a mediocre old woman of the Seventeenth Century an insight into mathematical depths perhaps beyond the utmost modern delvings of Planck, Heisenberg, Einstein, and de Sitter.
The house, known as the Witch House, was once the home of a notorious witch named Keziah Mason. Gilman becomes obsessed with the house and becomes a tenant, despite warnings from others about its dark past. As Gilman spends more time in the house, he begins to experience strange and terrifying phenomena.
“The Dreams in the Witch House” is a bad story. And yet…
Hardly anybody likes H.P. Lovecraft’s short story The Dreams in the Witch House. Even H.P. Lovecraft didn’t like it, and subsequent readers have generally considered it one of his worst.
And, by pretty much any objective measure, it’s a bad story. For one thing, there’s no surprise or subtlety to it—Lovecraft beats the reader over the head with the legend of Keziah Mason, and her rat-like familiar, Brown Jenkin. I think he was trying for ambiguity, but he was failing spectacularly at it. Walter Gilman, the doomed protagonist of the tale, should be able to see what’s coming a mile away; the reader certainly can.
In a good weird tale, there should be some question as to whether the supernatural doings are real, or simply a hallucination by the protagonist. Lovecraft was trying to do this, but he didn’t. The evidence favoring the supernatural explanation is simply overwhelming. And needlessly drawn out. When an author tells you on page one that a witch and a rat-like monster are up to no good, the final page should contain a bigger pay-off than “a witch and a rat-like monster were up to no good.”
Lovecraft, I’ve come to realize, had no idea how to hint or imply something. This is a problem when writing horror, because it is a genre that depends heavily on subtle hinting. And Lovecraft kind of knew this, but he couldn’t do it. So what he would do instead is write this:
“Eventually there had been a hint of vast, leaping shadows, of a monstrous, half-acoustic pulsing, and of the thin, monotonous piping of an unseen flute—but that was all. Gilman decided he had picked up that last conception from what he had read in the Necronomicon about the mindless entity Azathoth, which rules all time and space from a black throne at the centre of Chaos.”
He seems to have believed that by prefacing an outright statement with “A hint of…” that it would count as an actual hint.
Also, there are a number of lines that just sound downright silly. Like:
“What made the students shake their heads was his sober theory that a man might—given mathematical knowledge admittedly beyond all likelihood of human acquirement—step deliberately from the earth to any other celestial body which might lie at one of an infinity of specific points in the cosmic pattern.
Such a step, he said, would require only two stages; first, a passage out of the three-dimensional sphere we know, and second, a passage back to the three-dimensional sphere at another point, perhaps one of infinite remoteness.”
It sounds so easy! And then we have this masterful bit of understatement:
“May Eve was Walpurgis Night, when hell’s blackest evil roamed the earth and all the slaves of Satan gathered for nameless rites and deeds. It was always a very bad time in Arkham…”
In addition to these technical flaws, Witch House is one of Lovecraft’s nastiest tales. The sacrifice scene at the end is grotesque, and of course, it wouldn’t be Lovecraft without casual racial bigotry. What’s truly odd is that Lovecraft creates a story in which the poor, un-educated, and superstitious immigrants are clearly right in their beliefs, and the WASP upper-class is demonstrably wrong, and yet Lovecraft likes the WASPs better anyway.
It’s a badly-constructed, badly-written, and badly-paced tale, with a heavy emphasis on gore and none of the subtlety that Lovecraft at his best was capable of. And it comes with a side-serving of class arrogance and racial hatred. (BTW, I am a descendant of Eastern-European immigrants to the northeast United States, rather like the ones Lovecraft treats with utter contempt in this tale. Who are you calling “clod-like,” HPL?)
So, why do I re-read this horrible little tale every April?
Part of it is, I read it for the first time as a college student during spring term, and so I had some instant sympathy for poor Walter Gilman. Studying for exams is stressful enough without being abducted by long-dead witches and taken into other dimensions.
Also, Gilman is, in his own way, kind of heroic. He does ultimately fight back against the evil cosmic forces, and to some extent succeeds in thwarting them—even if it doesn’t work out well for him. Unusually for a Lovecraft character, he doesn’t just observe the horror and go mad, but takes some sort of corrective action. I kind of like that, even though the scene itself is six different kinds of ugly. (Also: why does the witch recoil from the crucifix? Oops, did someone have to undercut his entire atheistic literary philosophy in order to make his plot resolve itself?)
And finally, this book introduced me to Walpurgis Night, which is a great way for a Halloween-obsessed lunatic such as myself to get a mid-year fix. It’s not the really strong stuff, but it can keep me going for those long six months.
In his essay Good Bad Books, George Orwell defined same as “The kind of book that has no literary pretensions but which remains readable when more serious productions have perished… They form pleasant patches in one’s memory, quiet corners where the mind can browse at odd moments, but they hardly pretend to have anything to do with real life.”
This is what Lovecraft and a lot of the “pulp” writers of the era were doing. There aren’t any pretensions about these kinds of stories. (Indeed, since Lovecraft never intended to publish Witch House, he had no reason to be pretentious.)
That’s probably why stories like Witch House, that suck by standard measures, still have this quality of being re-readable. They’re authentic—when you read Lovecraft, you’re not getting what editors and publishers thought was a good book. You’re getting undiluted “Yog-Sothothery,” as Lovecraft called his peculiar style, straight from the bottle.
It’s almost like Lovecraft, in spite of his prejudices and unwillingness to curb his own bad writing habits, was able to tap in to some core principles that make for a good horror story.
Describing Keziah Mason, Lovecraft wrote:
[S]ome circumstance had more or less suddenly given a mediocre old woman of the Seventeenth Century an insight into mathematical depths perhaps beyond the utmost modern delvings of Planck, Heisenberg, Einstein, and de Sitter.
Similarly, it seems as if some circumstance gave a mediocre man of the 20th century an insight into writing horror that is perhaps beyond many modern practitioners of the genre.
Produced by Sean Branney and Andrew Leman
He hears strange noises in the walls, sees bizarre creatures in his dreams, and feels a malevolent presence surrounding him. These experiences are reminiscent of Lovecraft's themes of cosmic horror and the fragility of human sanity in the face of the unknown. As the story progresses, Gilman uncovers the secret rituals and practices that took place in the Witch House. He learns of Keziah Mason's pact with dark forces and her ability to travel through time and space. These revelations further unsettle Gilman, leading to his eventual descent into madness and disappearance. The Witch House is a chilling tale that showcases Lovecraft's ability to create an atmosphere of dread and terror. The story explores themes of ancient evil, forbidden knowledge, and the fragility of the human mind. Lovecraft's intricate descriptions of the Witch House, with its non-Euclidean geometry and sinister atmosphere, add to the sense of unease and otherworldliness. Overall, The Witch House is a masterful example of Lovecraft's unique style and his ability to tap into deep-seated fears and anxieties. It remains a classic of cosmic horror and continues to inspire and influence writers and filmmakers to this day..
Reviews for "The Connection Between Witchcraft and Madness in HP Lovecraft's Witch House"
1. Emily - 2 stars - I was really excited to read "Hp lovecraft witch house tory" because I'm a big fan of Lovecraft's works. However, I was thoroughly disappointed with this story. The writing was incredibly confusing, and I struggled to understand what was happening throughout the entire book. The characters were poorly developed, and I couldn't connect with any of them. Overall, I found this story to be a lackluster addition to Lovecraft's repertoire.
2. Michael - 1 star - "Hp lovecraft witch house tory" was one of the most poorly written books I have ever read. The language used was unnecessarily convoluted, to the point where I had to keep a dictionary next to me just to understand the basic plot. The plot itself was weak and predictable, with no real substance or depth. The whole story felt like a regurgitation of Lovecraft's ideas without any originality or creativity. I would not recommend this book to anyone.
3. Sarah - 2 stars - As a fan of Lovecraft, I was expecting "Hp lovecraft witch house tory" to be a thrilling and eerie read. Unfortunately, it fell flat for me. The story lacked cohesion and a clear direction, making it difficult to follow along. The characters were forgettable and the dialogue felt forced. Overall, I was unimpressed with this book and felt that it did not live up to the Lovecraft name.
4. John - 1 star - "Hp lovecraft witch house tory" was a complete disappointment. The writing was incredibly dull and uninspiring, and the story failed to evoke any sense of horror or suspense. The pacing was off, with long sections of exposition that did nothing to further the plot. I found myself struggling to finish this book and had no emotional investment in the outcome. Save yourself the time and avoid this one.