Why the Fsc Magic 200m Should be Your Go-To Communication Device

By admin

FSC Magic 200m is a high-quality fiber optic cable that is used for high-speed data transmission. It is designed to provide a fast and reliable connection over long distances, making it an ideal choice for telecommunications networks and other applications where high-speed data transfer is critical. The FSC Magic 200m cable is made using advanced fiber optic technology, which allows for the transmission of data at a speed of 200 Mbps. This speed is significantly faster than traditional copper cables, making it a preferred choice for businesses and organizations that require quick and efficient data transfer. The cable is also capable of transmitting data over long distances without any loss in signal quality. This is due to the use of high-quality materials and advanced manufacturing processes, which ensure that the cable is able to maintain a strong and stable signal throughout its length.


Take you feelings about a technology elsewhere, and don't comment if you have no advice on the hardware.

So we have given up trying to educate on this point, as every audio engineer has eventually done over the last half century, as the usual audiophile has an emotional need which cannot be reached by logic, reasoning and science. In most cases when attempting to use the DacMagic 200M with a mobile device, and an Apple Camera Adapter, the user will receive the following alert Cannot Use Accessory.

Fsc magic 200m

This is due to the use of high-quality materials and advanced manufacturing processes, which ensure that the cable is able to maintain a strong and stable signal throughout its length. In addition to its high-speed capabilities, the FSC Magic 200m cable is also highly durable and resistant to damage. It is designed to withstand harsh environmental conditions, including extreme temperatures and moisture, making it suitable for use in a wide range of applications.

Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M - review/comparison?

Hi, just wondering if anyone can let me know from specs if this is likely to be better than something like the SMSL M400?

I'm sure someone here will review this unit properly when it's release, but I've got my custom Purifi 5chan amp from Apollon turning up in a week and I want to decide on DAC to pair with it, and this is cheaper than the M400 I already have upstairs!

raistlin65

Major Contributor
Forum Donor Joined Nov 13, 2019 Messages 2,279 Likes 3,414 Location Grand Rapids, MI

You might want to specify what features you need with a DAC, as there are $100 units that are easily considered to be noise and distortion free within the range of human hearing.

Reactions: Leif

Sg86

Member
Joined Nov 20, 2020 Messages 38 Likes 7

raistlin65

Major Contributor
Forum Donor Joined Nov 13, 2019 Messages 2,279 Likes 3,414 Location Grand Rapids, MI

Sorry. I can't help with that. I ignore MQA as a feature for these reasons

Reactions: wooptoo , The Mule , Lambda and 6 others

Sg86

Member
Joined Nov 20, 2020 Messages 38 Likes 7

Sorry. I can't help with that. I ignore MQA as a feature for these reasons

I don't care about what you think about MQA, that isn't why I created the thread.

Take you feelings about a technology elsewhere, and don't comment if you have no advice on the hardware.

Reactions: biglebowski , Leif and TrueAudio

ahofer

Major Contributor
Forum Donor Joined Jun 3, 2019 Messages 4,013 Likes 7,024 Location New York City

Cambridge doesn't use measurements, which is a huge strike against them. But in terms of streaming functionality, I find their streamer/DACs excellent - full Roon integration, Chromecast support, airplay support, seamless switching between them. Really top notch.

  • “Beliefs are hypotheses to be tested, not treasures to be guarded." - Philip Tetlock
  • "Scientifically improbable claims require scientifically impeccable evidence" - Me.
  • ”We have been drawing attention….to the absolute necessity to separate the quantitative judgement of audio from the qualitative judgement by removing loudness as a bias. It has been ignored, and the audiophile business carrys on its own merry way. Those who work in sound professionally know that this is lesson 1 semester 1 in audiology: the very core of the science. So we have given up trying to educate on this point, as every audio engineer has eventually done over the last half century, as the usual audiophile has an emotional need which cannot be reached by logic, reasoning and science.” - Alan Shaw
Reactions: VintageFlanker and THIBAULT

Sg86

Member
Joined Nov 20, 2020 Messages 38 Likes 7

Cambridge doesn't use measurements, which is a huge strike against them. But in terms of streaming functionality, I find their streamer/DACs excellent - full Roon integration, Chromecast support, airplay support, seamless switching between them. Really top notch.

I was going to connect an Intel NUC to this/M400 via USB, NUC has Roon bridge on it.

If this 200M has Roon bridge software on it then no brainer for me, didn't think that was the case though?

Aldoszx

Active Member
Joined Aug 19, 2019 Messages 284 Likes 185

I don't think will have any software in it. I t is only a DAC, an improvement over the respectable DacMagic Plus.
They changed the DAC chip inside from Wolfson 8740 to ESS 9028Q2M
Maybe we'll see some measurements sometimes.

ROON, RPi, Ropieee, E50, D50s, E30, D10s, D10b Tone1, L30, Atom, 305P MkII, T5V+T10S, K371, MSR7

murraycamp

Senior Member
Forum Donor Joined Jul 10, 2019 Messages 421 Likes 647

I don't care about what you think about MQA, that isn't why I created the thread.

Take you feelings about a technology elsewhere, and don't comment if you have no advice on the hardware.

Nice way to encourage input. Best of luck.,

"[ASR] is a hot knife through the bullshit butter." - BDWoody
"Your ears are fine. It is the rest of you that is not." - amirm
"Maybe we are all NwAvGuy." - splattened

CCA (Qobuz)/CD transport>MiniDSP SHD>Quirk Audio/NAD 2200>JBL 590s
Planar 2, 2M Blue, RT 707
CCA>D50s>JDS Atom>Focal Clear

Reactions: wbenjin , zeropoint , VintageFlanker and 9 others

raistlin65

Major Contributor
Forum Donor Joined Nov 13, 2019 Messages 2,279 Likes 3,414 Location Grand Rapids, MI

I don't care about what you think about MQA, that isn't why I created the thread.

Take you feelings about a technology elsewhere, and don't comment if you have no advice on the hardware.

Don't be an ass. I was trying to help by asking you what features you needed, and then offering the reason why I couldn't help with that feature. And I don't know what you know about MQA. A lot of people don't know about why they might not want to care about it.

How about if you don't like the free advice you are getting, you either (a) ignore it or (b) hire a consultant who is paid to deal with your attitude?

Reactions: alexanderino , wbenjin , zeropoint and 10 others

Wes

Major Contributor
Forum Donor Joined Dec 5, 2019 Messages 3,848 Likes 3,769

You might start by not confusing feeling with data.

Reactions: VintageFlanker , The Mule , Katji and 2 others

BDWoody

Chief Cat Herder
Moderator Forum Donor Joined Jan 9, 2019 Messages 6,537 Likes 20,827 Location Mid-Atlantic, USA. (Maryland)

I don't care about what you think about MQA, that isn't why I created the thread.

Take you feelings about a technology elsewhere, and don't comment if you have no advice on the hardware.


No need for that.
You can dial it back please.

There ain't no Coupe deVille hiding at the bottom of a Cracker Jack Box. - Meat Loaf

When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time. - Maya Angelou

Reactions: alexanderino , wbenjin , zeropoint and 4 others

ahofer

Major Contributor
Forum Donor Joined Jun 3, 2019 Messages 4,013 Likes 7,024 Location New York City

I was going to connect an Intel NUC to this/M400 via USB, NUC has Roon bridge on it.

If this 200M has Roon bridge software on it then no brainer for me, didn't think that was the case though?


no, I think the Cxn is the least expensive one with the streaming software.
  • “Beliefs are hypotheses to be tested, not treasures to be guarded." - Philip Tetlock
  • "Scientifically improbable claims require scientifically impeccable evidence" - Me.
  • ”We have been drawing attention….to the absolute necessity to separate the quantitative judgement of audio from the qualitative judgement by removing loudness as a bias. It has been ignored, and the audiophile business carrys on its own merry way. Those who work in sound professionally know that this is lesson 1 semester 1 in audiology: the very core of the science. So we have given up trying to educate on this point, as every audio engineer has eventually done over the last half century, as the usual audiophile has an emotional need which cannot be reached by logic, reasoning and science.” - Alan Shaw

bigx5murf

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined Nov 6, 2018 Messages 522 Likes 340

Cambridge doesn't use measurements, which is a huge strike against them. But in terms of streaming functionality, I find their streamer/DACs excellent - full Roon integration, Chromecast support, airplay support, seamless switching between them. Really top notch.


What do you base that on? The few of their products Amir has reviewed have shown to meet or exceed their listed specs.

Reactions: abdo123 , Steve Dallas and Kuppenbender

ahofer

Major Contributor
Forum Donor Joined Jun 3, 2019 Messages 4,013 Likes 7,024 Location New York City

What do you base that on? The few of their products Amir has reviewed have shown to meet or exceed their listed specs.

Fair - they have published Frequency response, S/N, crosstalk. I don't think I've seen the Cambridge reviews here. I've been a bit turned off by the opacity on what sort of DAC is running in the Edge NQ, and that they claim to have "tuned" the whole Edge line by ear. I own one (NQ) btw. They offered it to me at a decent discount with a service return of my prior Cambridge DAC,back when it first came out.

The only thing I could get out of them - via direct email contact - was "we can confirm it is a NOS DAC".

It's nice DAC with great streaming and balanced outputs. Probably not worth a dime more than the CXN tho.

  • “Beliefs are hypotheses to be tested, not treasures to be guarded." - Philip Tetlock
  • "Scientifically improbable claims require scientifically impeccable evidence" - Me.
  • ”We have been drawing attention….to the absolute necessity to separate the quantitative judgement of audio from the qualitative judgement by removing loudness as a bias. It has been ignored, and the audiophile business carrys on its own merry way. Those who work in sound professionally know that this is lesson 1 semester 1 in audiology: the very core of the science. So we have given up trying to educate on this point, as every audio engineer has eventually done over the last half century, as the usual audiophile has an emotional need which cannot be reached by logic, reasoning and science.” - Alan Shaw
Fsc magic 200m

Overall, the FSC Magic 200m cable is a reliable and efficient solution for high-speed data transmission. Its advanced technology and durability make it an excellent choice for businesses and organizations that require fast and reliable data transfer over long distances..

Reviews for "Stay Ahead of the Curve with the Fsc Magic 200m"

1. Reviewer 1 - 2/5
I was really disappointed with the Fsc magic 200m. The product claims to be magical and provide an amazing experience, but it fell short of my expectations. The sound quality was quite poor and the connection was constantly dropping. Additionally, the battery life was not as long as advertised, and I found myself having to recharge it frequently. Overall, I do not recommend the Fsc magic 200m if you're looking for a reliable and high-quality product.
2. Reviewer 2 - 1/5
I regret purchasing the Fsc magic 200m. The design may look sleek, but that's about the only thing it has going for it. The sound quality is extremely poor, with a noticeable lack of bass and overall clarity. The range is also quite limited, and I could only stay connected within a few meters of the device. Despite having high hopes, I was left highly disappointed with this product and would not recommend it to anyone seeking a decent audio experience.
3. Reviewer 3 - 2/5
The Fsc magic 200m was a huge letdown for me. The overall build quality felt cheap and flimsy, and it seemed to be made of low-quality materials. Furthermore, the controls were not intuitive at all, and I found it difficult to navigate through the different functions. The battery life was also subpar, lasting only a few hours at a time. For the price point, I expected a much better product and would not recommend it to others. Save your money and look for alternatives that offer better value and performance.
4. Reviewer 4 - 2/5
I was less than impressed with the Fsc magic 200m. The sound quality was mediocre at best, with a distinct lack of depth and richness. The microphone was subpar as well, with callers often having difficulty hearing me clearly. The Bluetooth connectivity was spotty, frequently dropping and causing interruptions in audio playback. Overall, I found the performance to be underwhelming, and I would not recommend this product to anyone in search of a reliable and satisfactory listening experience.

Mastering the Fsc Magic 200m: A Beginner's Guide

The Fsc Magic 200m: A Revolutionary Advancement in Technology