In 2020, the world has witnessed the rise of numerous witch hunts. Although traditionally associated with the historical persecution of individuals accused of practicing witchcraft, the contemporary witch hunts focus on targeting people deemed to have committed societal crimes or held divergent views. These modern-day witch hunts have taken various forms, with social media acting as a catalyst for their swift dissemination. **One notable witch hunt occurred in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement**, as individuals and institutions faced scrutiny for past actions or statements considered racially insensitive or derogatory. While there is no denying the need to address systemic racism, **the indiscriminate vilification of individuals with no opportunity for redemption raises concerns about cancel culture and its potential long-term effects**. It is vital to distinguish between genuine efforts to combat racism and the wholesale condemnation of individuals, as the latter hinders constructive dialogue and undermines the possibility of growth and change.
First performed on Broadway in January of 1953, The Crucible was an allegory for the Red Scare instigated by Senator Joseph McCarthy. McCarthyism operated much like the witch trials in Massachusetts Bay, and also those in Denmark, stoking paranoia through gossip and eschewing hard evidence. False convictions (whether for allegiance with the Soviet Union or the devil) encouraged new accusations driven by escalating fear and opportunism.
This inversion is an extension of Trump s presentation of himself as an outsider inside the White House an effort to add the moral righteousness of the politically powerless to his political capital. Initiated by an ordinance that Christian passed against witches and their accomplices in 1617, witch hunting legitimized gossip as a basis for persecution.
It is vital to distinguish between genuine efforts to combat racism and the wholesale condemnation of individuals, as the latter hinders constructive dialogue and undermines the possibility of growth and change. **Another prominent witch hunt in 2020 targeted public figures and celebrities**. A single inappropriate comment or controversial statement has the potential to launch a relentless barrage of online criticism and demands for immediate cancellations or firings.
‘Witch Hunt’ Review: The Entire U.S. Becomes a Modern-Day Salem
A teen’s family runs a safe house for persecuted witches in this supernatural tale stronger on political allegory than thrills or chills.
Plus IconDennis Harvey
Latest
Courtesy of SXSWStriking a middle ground between teen fantasy “The Craft” and deadly serious political allegory “The Handmaid’s Tale” is “Witch Hunt,” writer-director Elle Callahan’s second feature. Her first, the 2019 “Head Count,” was a strikingly assured supernatural mind-bender, albeit one a little too understated for some genre fans. By contrast, this sophomore effort is comparatively conventional and straightforward in depicting paranormal themes, even given the added fillip of overt current-events commentary. It’s a more uneven work nonetheless, with some odd storytelling missteps and signs of budgetary constriction. Still, the fanciful tale of minority persecution in a U.S. not so different from our offscreen reality should easily attract acquisition interest around its SXSW premiere.
A grim prologue shows a manacled woman burned at a present-day New England stake in front of her two redheaded daughters. We then jump ahead three months to meet SoCal high schooler Claire (Gideon Adlon), whose classmates including mean-girl friend Jen (Lulu Antariksa) variously tease, bully and avoid any peers suspected of having “magic in the blood.” They also get homework assignments like writing papers on the 11th Amendment — a recent Bill of Rights addition that serves to deny those same folk the rights normal citizens enjoy. Being a witch isn’t strictly illegal … yet. But things are heading in that direction, with rising levels of prejudicial public hysteria, and federal Bureau of Witchcraft Investigation agents like Hawthorne (Christian Camargo) acting like bloodthirsty Grand Inquisitors.
All of which is rather awkward for Claire, who lives in a rambling remote farmhouse with widowed mother Martha (Elizabeth Mitchell) and twin younger siblings (Cameron and Nicolas Crovetti). She can’t invite friends over, or happily join in witch-bashing banter, because mom uses their home (which conveniently has hidden passageways between walls) as a safe house on a sort of underground railroad smuggling witches to Mexico, which is still granting them asylum.
The family has already received incoming refugees Fiona (Abigail Cowen) and Shae (Echo Campbell) — the two sisters who saw their mother’s gruesome demise back east — when their last “guest” gets caught en route to the border by Hawthorne and fellow BWI personnel. She too meets a fiery end, while a net tightens to ensnare any fleeing-witch enablers in the area.
A classic sullen teen, Claire is further disgruntled by the new arrivals. But she can’t help growing intrigued by friendly, seemingly serene, slightly-older Fiona, or feeling sorry for poor Shae, whom her own same-aged brothers refuse to play with. Meanwhile, Claire worries she might have some forbidden “powers” herself (despite lacking the telltale red hair). When she recklessly takes Fiona to a local bar, they inadvertently create a telekinetic ruckus that is sure to blow the family’s already-imperiled cover.
That Claire would endanger them all thus strains credulity. There are other misjudged elements, like an early encounter with a demon or some such that seems meant as a major plot element, yet never gets explained or utilized again. “Head Count” rested on unsettling ambiguity and tension, two things lacking here. It had little use for action, which Callahan doesn’t show much flair for in “Witch Hunt,” where it’s more important. Beyond a couple decent jump scares, the fantastical elements are handled in pedestrian fashion. Even a principal villain’s fate staged so it offers scant satisfaction, or even clarity. Some subpar effects work adds to a sense that Callahan may have had to cut corners in executing her full original conception.
What does get articulated fully here is the sociopolitical dimension, in which fantasy ideas invariably amplify punitive recent real-world trends regarding the rights of women, minorities and immigrants, complete with a heavily patrolled border “wall.” There’s also room to address xenophobia, prejudice and misogyny cloaked in patriotism, plus the popular pull worldwide toward fascistic leaders and police-state policies.
Some of this is pretty on-the-nose, if not excessively so for something partly aimed at a YA-type audience. Still, witchery works well as a metaphor, here being another thing blamed as a “choice” when in fact its practitioners were “born that way.” The script makes casual, interesting use of traditional superstitions, as well as the Salem trials’ reverberations. (Just what witches can or can’t do is left rather murky, though.) More a supernatural drama than horror, or even a thriller, “Witch Hunt” is in the end primarily an effective cautionary fable about intolerance, sweetened with genre elements.
In a competent cast, Cowen and Mitchell fare best. Production values are OK but sometimes feel a little sparse, with design contributions professional but uninspired. The modest “Head Count” also had a firmer grip on making the most of compositions and pacing.
While it is crucial to hold individuals accountable for their words and actions, it is equally important to allow space for education, growth, and understanding that people can evolve and change their perspectives over time. The absolute refusal to accept apologies or acknowledge personal growth casts doubt on society's ability to forgive and denies individuals the chance to learn from their mistakes. **Furthermore, the political landscape has not been immune to witch hunts in 2020**. As political polarization deepens, individuals find themselves subjected to intense scrutiny based on their political affiliations or beliefs. This has detrimental effects on democratic dialogue, as the focus shifts from substantive policy discussions to character attacks and demonization. **The prevalence of echo chambers and online misinformation exacerbates this issue**, as it allows for the propagation of unfounded accusations and the distortion of facts to suit predetermined narratives. In conclusion, the witch hunts happening in 2020 have deviated from their historical origins but retained their essence of targeting individuals for societal crimes or divergent views. **While it is essential to hold people accountable for their actions, the indiscriminate vilification and refusal to allow for growth and redemption raises concerns about the erosion of dialogue and the potential for long-term consequences**. Society should strive for a balanced approach that acknowledges mistakes, provides space for education and growth, and promotes healthy, constructive discussions that foster understanding and progress..
Reviews for "The Weaponization of Accusations: Navigating the Gray Areas in the Modern Climate"
1. John - 1 star
I found "Examine the witch hunt happening in 2020" to be a complete waste of time. The documentary lacks any substantial evidence or coherent arguments, and instead relies on conspiracy theories and fearmongering. It is clear that the filmmakers have an agenda, and the biased narrative leaves no room for objective analysis. I would not recommend this film to anyone seeking a thoughtful and well-researched examination of the so-called witch hunt happening in 2020.
2. Sarah - 2 stars
While "Examine the witch hunt happening in 2020" attempts to shed light on the issue of witch hunts in our modern society, it falls short in providing a comprehensive analysis. The documentary focuses too heavily on sensationalism rather than factual evidence, making it difficult to take the filmmakers' claims seriously. The lack of expert opinions and reliable sources only adds to the skepticism surrounding this film. While some may find it entertaining, I was disappointed by its lack of depth and compelling arguments.
3. Mark - 1 star
I regret spending my time watching "Examine the witch hunt happening in 2020." The documentary is nothing more than a poorly researched and bias-driven attempt to further a particular agenda. The filmmakers cherry-pick instances that support their narrative while conveniently ignoring any evidence that contradicts their claims. The lack of credible sources and analysis only serves to undermine the credibility of the film. Overall, I found it to be a shallow and unconvincing portrayal of the alleged witch hunt happening in 2020.
4. Emily - 3 stars
"Examine the witch hunt happening in 2020" raises some valid points about the dangers of mob mentality and cancel culture, but fails to delve deeper into the subject matter. The documentary lacks in-depth interviews and expert opinions, which would have strengthened its arguments. It also relies heavily on anecdotal evidence, making its claims seem unsubstantiated. While it has a thought-provoking premise, I was left wanting more nuance and evidence to back up its assertions.