While exploring my family history, I stumbled upon some intriguing information that led me to question whether my ancestors dabbled in witchcraft. As I delved deeper into the records and anecdotes passed down through generations, I discovered a series of peculiar occurrences and connections that suggested a possible involvement in the mystical arts. One of the earliest clues I uncovered was an old journal entry written by my great-great-grandmother. In her meticulous handwriting, she described witnessing peculiar rituals and gatherings that included elements of spellcasting and divination. Her account hinted at a hidden side of our family history that piqued my curiosity. Further investigation led me to discover that several of my ancestors held close ties to individuals accused of practicing witchcraft during a notorious period of witch trials in our region.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: Why do you think it's important to make these records public?
Senate candidate Christine O Donnell is riding a wave of campaign cash but also internet infamy, thanks in part to her controversial statements -- most notably on masturbation -- in the late 1990s on Bill Maher s Politically Incorrect. The list has also been posted on a genealogy website for those who may want to find out if their own family members got caught up in Scotland s witch-hunting fever.
Further investigation led me to discover that several of my ancestors held close ties to individuals accused of practicing witchcraft during a notorious period of witch trials in our region. Court transcripts and testimonies revealed a web of intertwined relationships and whispered accusations that suggested a deeper involvement in these practices. While no definitive evidence of witchcraft was found, the frequent mention of mystical beliefs and the presence of herbal remedies and charms in our family's history painted a compelling picture.
Are You Descended From (Alleged) Witches?
Digitized papers from 17th century Scotland could provide information on whether your ancestor was an alleged witch. Lulu Garcia-Navarro talks to Christopher Hilton of the Wellcome Library in London.
LOURDES GARCIA-NAVARRO, HOST:
And now for some 350-year-old gossip. London's Wellcome Library has digitized a manuscript called "Names Of Witches In Scotland 1658." It records everyone accused of witchcraft in the country between 1658 and 1662. The list has also been posted on a genealogy website for those who may want to find out if their own family members got caught up in Scotland's witch-hunting fever. Christopher Hilton is the senior archivist at the Wellcome Library. He joins us now from London.
Thanks so much for being with us.
CHRISTOPHER HILTON: Thank you for having me.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: So tell us about this manuscript, number 3,658, I believe. Who wrote it? Where does it come from?
HILTON: Right. OK. Well, it's essentially a list of names produced in Scotland in 1658, summarizing people accused of witchcraft. It didn't actually start out as a book. It began as a set of loose papers in five separate handwritings, presumably sent in from people dotted around Scotland in various locations. It's been collated, brought together, in Edinburgh and then folded up very small at some stage, presumably so that it could be carried around by a court messenger who was then convening trials in various locations.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: Well, let's step back a minute. Can you give us a bit of a history lesson? You know, I'm sure a lot of our listeners have heard of the Salem witch trials in the late 1600s or, you know, read "The Crucible" in high school. But what was it like in Scotland during this time period?
HILTON: The prosecutions that were being talked about in this particular document were launched under the Witchcraft Act of Scotland, which was passed in 1563. Now, at the time that it was passed, Scotland was a completely independent kingdom. And nothing like this Witchcraft Act existed in England and Wales, south of the border. So there is a distinctly Scottish flavor to witchcraft trials. And it seems to have gone on for 150 years or so. It was a fairly steady element in Scottish life.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: So what was the criteria back then to accuse someone of being a witch?
HILTON: The Witchcraft Act is notoriously baggy actually, notoriously vague. You were a witch if somebody thought you were a witch. I think we can hazard a guess as to some of the things that went on. I'm sure that in some cases people were genuinely casting spells and attempting to influence the world around them through what we would understand as magic now. In other cases, they doubtless were attempting folk medicine, carrying out things that we would see as more scientific.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: And just to remind people, what happened to these people after they were accused and possibly found guilty?
HILTON: You would be almost certainly interrogated in ways that breach any legal protocol now. As far as we're aware, about 4,000 people that we know of were accused of witchcraft during the currency of the act. And about 2,000 people were executed. So you had about a 50/50 chance of coming out of the process alive. But equally well, it would - you know, it was clearly not good news to be accused.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: Why do you think it's important to make these records public?
HILTON: I think there are a whole range of uses to which one could put them. One of the things that this document does is make people aware that what we now think of scientific medicine is something that has evolved over time. It basically gets people thinking about - what do we think of as being proper science? What do we think of as being magic? What do we think of as alternative medicine? And have the boundaries changed? We may come to think of quantum chromodynamics or something like that as - in the same way that we now think of witchcraft.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: Christopher Hilton, senior archivist at the Wellcome Library, thank you so much for being with us.
HILTON: Thank you for having me.
Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.
Speaking to The Associated Press, campaign spokeswoman Diana Banister said that O'Donnell was returning to Delaware to attend church events in a key county.
Moreover, the oral traditions and folklore passed through generations provided additional hints at my ancestors' potential involvement in witchcraft. Tales of unusual healing abilities, uncanny psychic predictions, and a deep connection to nature consistently arose in these stories. Although these accounts were often shrouded in ambiguity and speculation, they served as intriguing glimpses into the shadowy world of witchcraft that may have been part of our family's past. Yet, it is essential to approach such claims with skepticism. The historical context must be taken into account, acknowledging the rampant paranoia and witch hunts that plagued societies during certain periods. Accusations of witchcraft were often fueled by fear, superstition, and personal vendettas, making it challenging to separate fact from fiction. The line between folk beliefs, wise women, and actual practitioners of witchcraft becomes blurred, rendering it difficult to conclusively determine whether my ancestors were genuine witches or simply victims of circumstance. In conclusion, my exploration into my family's history has revealed compelling hints and connections that suggest my ancestors may have dabbled in witchcraft. From journal entries and court records to oral traditions and folklore, these pieces of the puzzle contribute to a mesmerizing narrative that raises more questions than answers. While the evidence remains circumstantial and open to interpretation, the possibility of a hidden lineage of mystics adds a fascinating layer to our family's story. The fascination with uncovering the truth behind my ancestors' potential involvement in witchcraft continues to captivate my imagination and spark further exploration into our rich and enigmatic family history..
Reviews for "Witchcraft Secrets: Investigating My Ancestors' Involvement"
1. John - 2 stars - While the concept of exploring one's ancestors' involvement in witchcraft may seem intriguing, the execution of this show fell flat for me. The episodes lacked depth and consistency, hopping from one family to another without providing enough context or evidence. Additionally, the host's constant speculation and exaggerated reactions felt forced and made it hard to take the show seriously. Overall, I was expecting more substance and a more objective approach to the subject matter.
2. Sarah - 1 star - I found "Did my ancestors dabble in witchcraft" to be a complete disappointment. The show seemed more interested in sensationalizing and creating drama rather than providing any meaningful historical context. The host's over-the-top reactions and constant emphasis on spookiness felt forced and gimmicky. The episodes lacked any real depth or solid evidence, leaving me frustrated and questioning the credibility of the entire series. If you're looking for a serious exploration of genealogy or witchcraft, this show is not for you.
3. Michael - 2 stars - As someone who enjoys learning about history and genealogy, I was excited to watch "Did my ancestors dabble in witchcraft". However, I was quickly let down by the lack of substantial evidence and the overall sensationalism of the show. The host's constant speculation and reliance on vague connections made it difficult to take any of the claims seriously. Additionally, the show felt disjointed, jumping from one story to another without providing enough background context. I was expecting a more informative and well-researched series, but unfortunately, that was not the case here.
4. Emily - 1 star - I couldn't finish watching "Did my ancestors dabble in witchcraft" because it felt more like a cheesy ghost-hunting show than a serious exploration of history. The host's exaggerated reactions and focus on spookiness detracted from any potential educational value the series could have had. The lack of solid evidence or in-depth research made it hard to take any of the claims seriously. Overall, this show seemed more interested in sensationalizing the subject matter than providing any meaningful insights into ancestral connections to witchcraft.
5. David - 2 stars - While the idea of exploring one's ancestors' involvement in witchcraft is intriguing, "Did my ancestors dabble in witchcraft" failed to deliver a compelling and well-researched series. The episodes lacked depth and often relied on speculation and exaggerated claims. The show seemed more focused on creating entertainment than providing historical accuracy or valuable genealogical insights. I was disappointed by the lack of substance and the overall disjointed nature of the series.