Dark magic is a mysterious and intriguing concept that has been subject to much speculation and fascination throughout history. It is often associated with rituals and practices that involve manipulating or harnessing supernatural forces for personal gain or harm. While the exact definition of dark magic may vary depending on cultural beliefs and traditions, it generally entails the use of spells, curses, and other occult practices to achieve one's desired outcome, usually at the expense of others. One common misconception about dark magic is that it is inherently evil or malevolent. While dark magic can certainly be used for negative purposes, such as causing harm to others or manipulating their free will, it can also be employed for more neutral or even positive intentions. For instance, individuals may use dark magic to protect themselves or their loved ones from harm, to gain insight or wisdom, or to explore the depths of their own consciousness.
For instance, individuals may use dark magic to protect themselves or their loved ones from harm, to gain insight or wisdom, or to explore the depths of their own consciousness. However, it is important to note that the practice of dark magic often comes with consequences. Many societies and cultures view dark magic as dangerous and forbidden, and those who engage in its use are sometimes ostracized or feared.
Revealed: more than 90% of rainforest carbon offsets by biggest certifier are worthless, analysis shows
The forest carbon offsets approved by the world’s leading certifier and used by Disney, Shell, Gucci and other big corporations are largely worthless and could make global heating worse, according to a new investigation.
The research into Verra, the world’s leading carbon standard for the rapidly growing $2bn (£1.6bn) voluntary offsets market, has found that, based on analysis of a significant percentage of the projects, more than 90% of their rainforest offset credits – among the most commonly used by companies – are likely to be “phantom credits” and do not represent genuine carbon reductions.
The analysis raises questions over the credits bought by a number of internationally renowned companies – some of them have labelled their products “carbon neutral”, or have told their consumers they can fly, buy new clothes or eat certain foods without making the climate crisis worse.
But doubts have been raised repeatedly over whether they are really effective.
The nine-month investigation has been undertaken by the Guardian, the German weekly Die Zeit and SourceMaterial, a non-profit investigative journalism organisation. It is based on new analysis of scientific studies of Verra’s rainforest schemes.
It has also drawn on dozens of interviews and on-the-ground reporting with scientists, industry insiders and Indigenous communities. The findings – which have been strongly disputed by Verra – are likely to pose serious questions for companies that are depending on offsets as part of their net zero strategies.
Verra, which is based in Washington DC, operates a number of leading environmental standards for climate action and sustainable development, including its verified carbon standard (VCS) that has issued more than 1bn carbon credits. It approves three-quarters of all voluntary offsets. Its rainforest protection programme makes up 40% of the credits it approves and was launched before the Paris agreement with the aim of generating revenue for protecting ecosystems.
Verra argues that the conclusions reached by the studies are incorrect, and questions their methodology. And they point out that their work since 2009 has allowed billions of dollars to be channelled to the vital work of preserving forests.
The investigation found that:
- Only a handful of Verra’s rainforest projects showed evidence of deforestation reductions, according to two studies, with further analysis indicating that 94% of the credits had no benefit to the climate.
- The threat to forests had been overstated by about 400% on average for Verra projects, according to analysis of a 2022 University of Cambridge study.
- Gucci, Salesforce, BHP, Shell, easyJet, Leon and the band Pearl Jam were among dozens of companies and organisations that have bought rainforest offsets approved by Verra for environmental claims.
- Human rights issues are a serious concern in at least one of the offsetting projects. The Guardian visited a flagship project in Peru, and was shown videos that residents said showed their homes being cut down with chainsaws and ropes by park guards and police. They spoke of forced evictions and tensions with park authorities.
Additionally, the use of dark magic is often believed to have a corrupting influence on the individual, as it can twist their morals and ethics, leading them down a path of darkness and destruction. Despite the risks and societal taboos associated with dark magic, there are still individuals who are drawn to its power and allure. These practitioners may delve deep into ancient texts and rituals to uncover forbidden knowledge and unlock their own hidden potential. They may form covens or join secret societies dedicated to the study and practice of dark magic, seeking to further their understanding and mastery of its forces. In conclusion, dark magic is a complex and multifaceted concept that has captured the imaginations of people across time and cultures. While it is often viewed as an inherently negative or dangerous practice, it can also be approached with a sense of responsibility and respect for the supernatural forces it seeks to harness. Whether utilized for good or ill, dark magic remains a topic steeped in mystery and intrigue, offering a glimpse into the hidden depths of human potential and the unseen forces that shape our world..
Reviews for "Dark Magic and Love Spells: Exploring the Boundaries"
- Laura - 1 star
I found "Dark magic k dios" to be incredibly confusing and hard to follow. The storyline jumped around too much and I had a hard time keeping track of the characters. The writing style was also not to my liking, it felt choppy and disjointed. Overall, I was disappointed with this book and wouldn't recommend it to others.
- John - 2 stars
I had high expectations for "Dark magic k dios" based on the hype, but I was left feeling underwhelmed. The plot was predictable and the characters were one-dimensional. I also felt like the pacing was off, with some parts dragging on while others were rushed. The dialogue was also poorly written and lacked depth. Unfortunately, this book just didn't live up to its potential for me.
- Emily - 2 stars
I had a hard time connecting with the characters in "Dark magic k dios". They felt flat and lacked development, making it difficult for me to care about their journey. The magical elements of the story were also confusing and poorly explained. I found myself skimming through parts of the book as I lost interest. Overall, this book was a letdown for me and I wouldn't recommend it.