The curse of bigmess refers to the negative consequences of having a disorganized or cluttered living or working space. This curse can affect various aspects of one's life, including physical health, mental well-being, productivity, and overall happiness. When a living or working space is messy, it becomes a breeding ground for dust, allergens, and bacteria. This can lead to an increase in respiratory problems, allergies, and even infections. Additionally, clutter can create obstacles and hazards, increasing the risk of accidents and injuries. Moreover, a messy space can have a profound impact on an individual's mental well-being.
From the man who coined the term net neutrality and who has made significant contributions to our understanding of antitrust policy and wireless communications, comes a call for tighter antitrust enforcement and an end to corporate bigness.
In The Curse of Bigness , Tim Wu, special assistant to President Biden for technology and competition policy, explains how figures like Brandeis and Theodore Roosevelt first confronted the democratic threats posed by the great trusts of the Gilded Age--but the lessons of the Progressive Era were forgotten in the last 40 years. Together with President Theodore Roosevelt, who put enforcement muscle behind the Sherman Act, they persuasively argued that monopolistic practices are inefficient, stifle innovation as well as competition, and court abusive practices against workers.
Moreover, a messy space can have a profound impact on an individual's mental well-being. It can cause feelings of stress, anxiety, and overwhelm. The constant visual reminder of unfinished tasks and disorder can make it difficult to relax and unwind.
THE CURSE OF BIGNESS
A valuable briefing on an underappreciated business problem, but it could use a bit of Roosevelt’s hard-nosed attitude.
Should Amazon and Google be broken up like Standard Oil? Yes, argues legal scholar Wu (Columbia Law School; The Attention Merchants: The Epic Scramble to Get Inside Our Heads, 2016, etc.), but breaking up is hard to do.
The problem is a decadeslong warping of antitrust law, which the author details in this half history, half polemic book. The title comes from a phrase coined by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, who agitated against Gilded Age monopolists like John D. Rockefeller and J.P. Morgan. Together with President Theodore Roosevelt, who put enforcement muscle behind the Sherman Act, they persuasively argued that monopolistic practices are inefficient, stifle innovation as well as competition, and court abusive practices against workers. (Think of AT&T, Wu suggests, a longtime state-sanctioned monopoly whose breakup cleared the way for the mainstream internet.) For much of the 20th century, Brandeis' view was accepted regulatory practice, until the arrival in the 1960s of Robert Bork, who, as a federal judge, prescribed an exceedingly narrow interpretation of the Sherman Act: So long as consumer prices didn’t rise, no conglomerate qualified as a monopoly, regardless of market share. The Borkian argument, however far afield from Sherman’s intent, is now gospel, Wu writes, rendering Security and Exchange Commission antitrust regulators toothless. This has allowed Google to bloat with buyouts—though, as Wu points out, it was a beneficiary of antitrust enforcement against Microsoft—developing unchecked acquisitive instincts that have eliminated competitors, with Facebook and Amazon following its lead. The author convincingly draws parallels between the new “tech trusts” and the Gilded Age titans, but one wishes for more fire in the argument: Wu’s background about Brandeis is important, but the modern implications could be better woven into his narrative. As it is, his strongest cases for breaking up Google are tucked into dry concluding policy prescriptions.
A valuable briefing on an underappreciated business problem, but it could use a bit of Roosevelt’s hard-nosed attitude.
Pub Date: Nov. 13, 2018
ISBN: 978-0-9997454-6-5
Page Count: 170
Publisher: Columbia Global Reports
“Persuasive and brilliantly written, the book is especially timely given the rise of trillion-dollar tech companies.” —Publishers Weekly
This can lead to a cycle of procrastination and decreased productivity. Furthermore, a cluttered environment can hinder one's ability to focus and concentrate. It can be challenging to find necessary items, leading to frustration and wasted time. Additionally, clutter can negatively impact creativity and innovation, as it limits the physical and mental space needed for new ideas to flourish. This can hinder personal and professional growth. The curse of bigmess can also affect one's social life and relationships. A messy space can be embarrassing and may discourage friends or family from visiting. It can also create tension in relationships, as differing levels of cleanliness and organization can lead to conflicts and arguments. To break the curse of bigmess, it is essential to establish and maintain good organizational habits. This can involve decluttering regularly, finding designated spaces for items, implementing effective storage solutions, and establishing cleaning routines. Adopting these practices can lead to a sense of calm and control, improving overall well-being and quality of life. In conclusion, the curse of bigmess is a real phenomenon that can have detrimental effects on physical health, mental well-being, productivity, and relationships. By prioritizing organization and cleanliness, individuals can break this curse and create a more harmonious and fulfilling living or working environment..
Reviews for "Bigmess and Time Wasted: How Decluttering Can Lead to a More Meaningful Life"
1. John - 2 out of 5 stars
I had high hopes for "The Curse of Bigmess" but I ended up being sorely disappointed. The plot was messy and confusing, with poorly developed characters that I couldn't connect with. The pacing was all over the place, jumping from one scene to another without any clear direction. Overall, it felt like a jumbled mess of ideas that were thrown together without much thought. Save your time and skip this one.
2. Sarah - 1 out of 5 stars
I can honestly say that "The Curse of Bigmess" is one of the worst movies I've ever seen. The storyline made no sense, and the acting was terrible. The special effects were laughably bad, with cheap-looking CGI that took away any sense of realism. I couldn't wait for it to end and was left feeling like I wasted my time and money. Do yourself a favor and avoid this disaster of a film.
3. Rebecca - 2 out of 5 stars
"The Curse of Bigmess" had potential, but it fell flat on so many levels. The dialogue was cringeworthy and unrealistic, making it difficult to take the characters seriously. The plot was unoriginal and lacked any surprises or twists. It felt like a paint-by-numbers horror movie that didn't bring anything new to the genre. I was left feeling bored and unsatisfied, wishing I had chosen a different film to watch. Don't bother with this one unless you're desperate for a mediocre horror flick.