Martha Stewart has been widely known for her career as a businesswoman, television personality, author, and homemaker. However, there have been instances where she has been compared to a witch. This comparison does not refer to her practicing witchcraft or being a supernatural being, but rather to her reputation as a powerful and influential figure who manipulates and controls situations to her benefit. The term "witch" is often associated with someone who possesses qualities of cunning, manipulation, and the ability to exert control over people or events. In this context, some critics and commentators have used this term to describe Martha Stewart due to her perceived shrewdness, ambition, and influence in various industries. Martha Stewart's rise to fame came primarily through her homemaking and cooking expertise, which she shared through her television shows, books, and magazine publications.
Now sit back and enjoy! So much Fun.
During the process, prosecutors say Waksal alerted friends and family about the impending news as well, so that they could try to unload their shares as well. During the process, prosecutors say Waksal alerted friends and family about the impending news as well, so that they could try to unload their shares as well.
Martha Stewart's rise to fame came primarily through her homemaking and cooking expertise, which she shared through her television shows, books, and magazine publications. Many people admire her for her attention to detail, creativity, and ability to transform ordinary spaces or recipes into extraordinary ones. However, there is a segment of society that views her success as a result of her strategic maneuvering, calculating nature, and the ability to bend rules or manipulate the system to her advantage.
Marthaa stewart witch
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Martha Stewart is annoying and elitist. But that doesn't make her a criminal. Nevertheless, everyone is treating her like one.
Sure, it's titillating to think of Stewart -- with her clean-pressed linens and color-coordinated dinnerware -- being dragged away in handcuffs. Crowds around the courthouse, reveling in the comeuppance of the rich and condescending, screaming things like, "How do pastels go with stripes, Martha. " Shades of Leona "Taxes are for Little People" Helmsley.
But the fact of the matter is, Martha is looking pretty clean, even if Ms. Gracious Living hangs out with some characters who are less savory than one of her stews.
That would be, of course, Sam Waksal, the CEO of ImClone Systems who recently got arrested for insider trading.
Although he hasn't had his day in court, the prosecutors seem to have a pretty strong argument. Waksal got a heads-up that the FDA was going to give ImClone's wonderdrug, Erbitux, a thumbs-down. He allegedly tried to dump his stock in the company before that information was made public. During the process, prosecutors say Waksal alerted friends and family about the impending news as well, so that they could try to unload their shares as well.
Investigators are looking at Waksal's "friends and family" plan and deciding who should join him at the defendant's table.
Martha Stewart is a friend of Waksal's. Martha owned stock in ImClone. Martha sold her ImClone stock the day before it tanked on the FDA news.
Did Martha get a tip from Waksal?
They both say "no." And absent any proof to the contrary -- and FBI, SEC, and congressional investigators can't seem to find any -- you have to accept that.
And in fact, Martha has a plausible, even credible, explanation for her fortuitous stock sale -- the price went below $60 a share. That was her cutoff point for stopping a loss on her investment.
Sure, Martha and her broker may disagree on when she set that $60 price as her cutoff. He says mid-December, she says late November. Either way, it was before Waksal had his crucial bit of FDA news.
And face it, Martha is a smart businesswoman, well-versed in the ways of the market. She was a stockbroker at one time, for Pete's sake. It makes sense she would have a stop-loss strategy in mind and in place. Heck, we here at the CNN/Money make our living advising folks to do such sensible things.
In addition . folks, we're talking about a sale of 3,928 ImClone shares at $58. She made a little less than $230,000. If she had traded them in the day after the news, she would have probably gotten around $180,000.
So we're talking fifty grand. Martha Stewart makes more money blowing her nose with an Irish linen napkin on the TV.
You get the point?
And it's not just Martha getting personally damaged here. Her Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia stock has taken a pounding since the ImClone scandal broke. Investors, who may just think her Gracious Living lifestyle is worth something, are getting hurt too.
Now I'll be the first to admit I find Martha incredibly irritating. Former model, fashion diva, smart, famous . she's just so damn successful. And she still has time to cook puff pastries and fold towels correctly. Other folks -- including my wife -- find her advice and products useful and valuable. I see them as overpriced reminders that I'm time-compressed and socially inadequate.
But I recognize that these complaints are just me. And sure, Martha Stewart is part of the new aristocrat class that is distorting our country's democratic scheme. But that's not her fault.
Sure, there looks like there is plenty of corruption in the ImClone saga. For that matter, there is plenty of corruption in Corporate America in general. And, thankfully, it is being routed out.
But the danger in such purges is that they can easily become pogroms and witch hunts.
At this point, rhymes aside, Martha isn't a witch.
Allen Wastler is Managing Editor of CNN Money and a morning commentator on CNNfn. He can be emailed here.
10 wood screws (#8 x 1/2″ for witch, broom, and lantern conduit straps) $1.17 pack of 4
One example that led to the "witch" label was Martha Stewart's involvement in the ImClone insider trading scandal in 2001. She was accused of selling her shares in the company based on inside information about a pending negative announcement. This incident led to her conviction and subsequent imprisonment. While she has always maintained her innocence, some people believe that her actions were a reflection of her manipulative persona. Another aspect that contributes to the perception of Martha Stewart as a witch-like figure is her high standards and perfectionist tendencies. She is known for her perfectionism in all aspects of her life, from her perfectly decorated homes to her perfectly presented meals. While this attention to detail is seen by many as admirable, others view it as a way for her to control every aspect of her environment and maintain a meticulous image. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize that labeling Martha Stewart as a "witch" is a subjective viewpoint. People's opinions are shaped by their own perceptions, biases, and interpretations of her actions and persona. Furthermore, it is crucial to remember that her positive contributions cannot be overlooked or overshadowed by these criticisms. In conclusion, Martha Stewart has been likened to a witch due to her perceived manipulative nature, strategic behavior, and high standards. These comparisons are not based on her practicing witchcraft or supernatural abilities but rather on her reputation as a powerful and influential figure who exerts control to achieve her goals. While this label is subjective, it highlights the varying interpretations of her actions and persona..
Reviews for "Marthaa Stewart's Witchy Travel Guide: Magical Destinations around the World"
1. John - 1 star
I found "Marthaa Stewart Witch" to be extremely boring and unengaging. The storyline felt rushed and lacked depth, leaving me with no attachment to any of the characters. Furthermore, the writing style was quite monotonous and did not manage to capture my attention. I was excited to read a story about a witch, but unfortunately, this book did not deliver on its promises. I would not recommend "Marthaa Stewart Witch" to anyone looking for an exciting and immersive read.
2. Sarah - 2 stars
While "Marthaa Stewart Witch" had an interesting premise, I found the execution to be disappointing. The pacing of the story was inconsistent, with slow moments dragging on for too long and exciting scenes being rushed through. Additionally, I had trouble connecting with the main character, as her motivations and actions often felt unrealistic or poorly developed. The overall writing style was also lackluster, lacking the spark and charm that I was hoping for. Overall, I believe there are better witch-themed books out there that offer a more enjoyable reading experience.