An armor enchantment rune in Pathfinder 2e is a magical enhancement that can be added to armor to provide additional benefits and abilities. These runes can be embedded onto the armor by a character with the appropriate crafting skill, or purchased from merchants. Armor enchantment runes come in different tiers, with each tier providing increasingly powerful effects. The tiers range from the basic "lesser" runes, to the intermediate "standard" runes, and finally to the advanced "greater" runes. One of the main benefits of armor enchantment runes is that they can provide resistance to specific types of damage. For example, a rune may grant resistance to fire damage, allowing the wearer to take less damage from fire-based attacks.
Chapter 1. Nicholas Stockdale, Norfolk, 1593–1619
Using a series of case studies that begin in Elizabethan Norfolk and end with the Salem trials in Massachusetts, this book examines six individual male witches and argues they are best understood as masculine witches, not feminized men. Using a series of case studies that begin in Elizabethan Norfolk and end with the Salem trials in Massachusetts, this book examines six individual male witches and argues they are best understood as masculine witches, not feminized men.
For example, a rune may grant resistance to fire damage, allowing the wearer to take less damage from fire-based attacks. This can be especially helpful in situations where enemies primarily use a specific type of damage. Another common benefit of armor enchantment runes is the ability to grant bonuses to specific skills or statistics.
Cases of Male Witchcraft in Old and New England, 1592-1692
This exciting new study examines cases of male witchcraft from the English Atlantic world in order to explore the kinds of masculine behaviour exhibited by men accused of witchcraft, the way this behaviour shaped accusations of witchcraft against them, and the responses such men evoked in the communities who accused them.
- Religious history (c. 1501-1800)
- Heresies, persecutions of heterodoxy & sects
- British Isles (c. 1501-1800)
- North America
"This study reminds us that male witches were, nonetheless, a real and frightening possibility for early modern people. Kent’s work sheds light on this important minority of suspects, and will prove extremely stimulating and valuable to future scholars in this field." (Darren Oldridge, in: Renaissance Quarterly , Vol. 67, No. 3 (Fall 2014), pp. 1056-1057)
SummaryThis study explores cases in which men were accused of witchcraft in England and the British colonies of New England between 1592 and 1692. Using a series of case studies that begin in Elizabethan Norfolk and end with the Salem trials in Massachusetts, this book examines six individual male witches and argues they are best understood as masculine witches, not feminized men. Each case considers the social circumstances of the male witch as a gendered context for the accusations of witchcraft against him.
Instead of seeking to identify a single causal condition or overarching gendered circumstance whereby men were accused of witchcraft, this study examines the way that masculinity shaped the accusations of witchcraft made against each man. In each case, a range of masculine social and cultural roles became implicated in accusations of witchcraft, making it possible to explore how beliefs in witches interacted with early modern English gender cultures to support the religious, legal, and cultural logic of the male witch. The result is an approach to early modern English witchcraft prosecution that includes, rather than problematizes, the male witch.
TABLE OF CONTENTSChapter 1. Nicholas Stockdale, Norfolk, 1593–1619
Chapter 2. Edwin Haddesley, Essex, 1597–1607
Chapter 3. John Lowes, Suffolk, 1600–45
Chapter 4. Hugh Parsons, Springfield, Massachusetts, 1648–52
Chapter 5. John Godfrey, Massachusetts, 1640–75
Chapter 6. George Burroughs, Salem Village, Massachusetts, 1692
Chapter 2. Edwin Haddesley, Essex, 1597–1607
For example, a rune may grant a bonus to the wearer's Dexterity score, making them more agile and harder to hit. This can be particularly useful for characters who rely on their mobility in combat. Some armor enchantment runes also provide special abilities or effects. For instance, a rune may allow the wearer to teleport a short distance once per day, giving them the ability to quickly reposition themselves in combat. These types of runes can be particularly valuable for characters who rely on tactical positioning to gain an advantage in battle. Overall, armor enchantment runes in Pathfinder 2e are a versatile and powerful tool for characters to enhance their defenses and capabilities. Whether it's providing resistance to specific types of damage, boosting skills and statistics, or granting unique abilities, these runes can make a significant difference in combat encounters and adventures..
Reviews for "The Role of Armor Enchantment Runes in Character Building in Pathfinder 2e"
1. Mia - 1 star - I was really disappointed with the armor enchantment rune in Pathfinder 2e. It claims to improve the effectiveness of your armor, but I didn't feel any noticeable difference while playing. It just felt like a waste of resources and gold. I would much rather invest in other abilities or items that have a more significant impact on my character's defenses.
2. John - 2 stars - The armor enchantment rune in Pathfinder 2e left me underwhelmed. While it technically provides a slight bonus to AC, it's not significant enough to justify the costs associated with obtaining and upgrading it. I found myself constantly looking for other ways to improve my character's defense, as the rune's effects felt lackluster. Overall, I wouldn't recommend investing too much time or resources into this particular enchantment.
3. Sarah - 1 star - As a player who values versatility and utility, the armor enchantment rune in Pathfinder 2e left me feeling unimpressed. While it may provide a slight boost to armor class, it lacks the unique and interesting abilities that other runes offer. I found myself wishing for more diverse options to enhance my character's armor, rather than settling for this mundane rune. It's definitely not worth the investment, in my opinion.
4. Alex - 2 stars - The armor enchantment rune in Pathfinder 2e is nothing groundbreaking. It offers a minor bonus to armor class, but lacks the excitement and variety that I look for in enchantments. Compared to other runes, it just feels bland and unremarkable. I would recommend exploring other options for enhancing your character's armor, as this rune is simply not worth the effort or gold.